Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

NCA5 Logo
    • About This Report
    • Guide to the Report
    • Report Credits
    • Companion Podcast
    • Additional Resources
    • About this Report
    • Guide to this Report
    • OVERVIEW
    • Physical Science
    • 2. Climate Trends
    • 3. Earth Systems Processes
    • National Topics
    • 4. Water
    • 5. Energy
    • 6. Land
    • 7. Forests
    • 8. Ecosystems
    • 9. Coasts
    • 10. Oceans
    • 11. Agriculture
    • 12. Built Environment
    • 13. Transportation
    • 14. Air Quality
    • 15. Human Health
    • 16. Indigenous Peoples
    • 17. International
    • 18. Complex Systems
    • 19. Economics
    • 20. Social Systems and Justice
    • Regions
    • 21. Northeast
    • 22. Southeast
    • 23. US Caribbean
    • 24. Midwest
    • 25. Northern Great Plains
    • 26. Southern Great Plains
    • 27. Northwest
    • 28. Southwest
    • 29. Alaska
    • 30. Hawai'i and US-Affiliated Pacific Islands
    • Responses
    • 31. Adaptation
    • 32. Mitigation
    • Focus On
    • F1. Compound Events
    • F2. Western Wildfires
    • F3. COVID-19 and Climate Change
    • F4. Risks to Supply Chains
    • F5. Blue Carbon
    • Appendices
    • A1. Process
    • A2. Information Quality
    • A3. Scenarios and Datasets
    • A4. Indicators
    • A5. Glossary

    • All Figures
    • All Key Messages
    • View All Report Downloads
    • Download Full Chapter PDF
    • Download Chapter Handout
    • Download Chapter Figures (.zip)
    • Download Chapter Presentation Package
    • Descargar en Español
  • Art × Climate
  • NCA Atlas
  • EN ESPAÑOL
Human Health
i

Fifth National Climate Assessment
15. Human Health

  • SECTIONS
  • Introduction
  • 15.1. Climate Change Harms Health
  • 15.2. Disproportionate Impacts
  • 15.3. Adaptation and Mitigation
  • Traceable Accounts
  • References
Previous Chapter
View All Figures
Next Chapter
Climate change is harming physical, mental, spiritual, and community health through the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme events, higher incidences of infectious and vector-borne diseases, and declines in food and water security. These impacts worsen social inequities. Emissions reductions, effective adaptation measures, and climate-resilient health systems can protect human health and improve health equity.

INTRODUCTION

Climate change has profound negative effects on human health. Climate-related extreme events that impact the US population include floods, droughts, wildfires, extreme temperatures, and storms. All are expected to increase in frequency, intensity, and extent (KM 2.2). Health risks from a changing climate include higher rates of heat-related morbidity and mortality; increases in the geographic range of some infectious diseases; greater exposure to poor air quality; increases in some adverse pregnancy outcomes; higher rates of pulmonary, neurological, and cardiovascular diseases; and worsening mental health.1,2,3,4,5,6,7 These risks affect all US residents but have disproportionate repercussions for under-resourced and overburdened communities and individuals, such as pregnant people, communities of color, children, people with disabilities, people experiencing homelessness, people with chronic diseases, and older adults. Structural racism and discrimination against groups that have been marginalized play a direct role in health inequities and are public health crises.8 Existing and projected human health impacts of climate change affect populations that are already experiencing an unprecedented decline in life expectancy due to environmental, social, political, and economic conditions that determine community health and well-being.9,10,11 Creating climate-resilient health systems, implementing adaptation measures, and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can protect human health.

Authors
Federal Coordinating Lead Author
Paul J. Schramm, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Chapter Lead Author
Mary H. Hayden, University of Colorado, Lyda Hill Institute for Human Resilience
Chapter Authors
Charles B. Beard, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases
Jesse E. Bell, University of Nebraska Medical Center
Aaron S. Bernstein, Boston Children's Hospital
Ashley Bieniek-Tobasco, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Nikki Cooley, Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals, Tribes & Climate Change Program
Maria Diuk-Wasser, Columbia University
Michael K. Dorsey, Club of Rome
Kristie Ebi, University of Washington
Kacey C. Ernst, University of Arizona
Morgan E. Gorris, Los Alamos National Laboratory
Peter D. Howe, Utah State University
Ali S. Khan, University of Nebraska Medical Center
Clarita Lefthand-Begay, Navajo Nation and University of Washington
Julie Maldonado, Livelihoods Knowledge Exchange Network
Shubhayu Saha, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Fatemeh Shafiei, Spelman College
Ambarish Vaidyanathan, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Olga V. Wilhelmi, National Center for Atmospheric Research
Contributors
Technical Contributors
Rebecca L. Achey, University of Colorado
Bhargavi Chekuri, University of Colorado School of Medicine
Christopher T. Emrich, University of Central Florida
Melanie Gall, Arizona State University
Leo Goldsmith, US Global Change Research Program / ICF
Caitlin A. Gould, US Environmental Protection Agency
Penelope Stein, Harvard Law School Project on Disability
Michael Stein, Harvard Law School Project on Disability
Review Editor
Caroline Anitha Devadason, Harvard University
USGCRP Coordinators
Rebecca L. Achey, University of Colorado
Leo Goldsmith, US Global Change Research Program / ICF
Allyza R. Lustig, US Global Change Research Program / ICF
Recommended Citation

Hayden, M.H., P.J. Schramm, C.B. Beard, J.E. Bell, A.S. Bernstein, A. Bieniek-Tobasco, N. Cooley, M. Diuk-Wasser, Michael K. Dorsey, K.L. Ebi, K.C. Ernst, M.E. Gorris, P.D. Howe, A.S. Khan, C. Lefthand-Begay, J. Maldonado, S. Saha, F. Shafiei, A. Vaidyanathan, and O.V. Wilhelmi, 2023: Ch. 15. Human health. In: Fifth National Climate Assessment. Crimmins, A.R., C.W. Avery, D.R. Easterling, K.E. Kunkel, B.C. Stewart, and T.K. Maycock, Eds. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA. https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA5.2023.CH15

Download citation: BibTeX     |     RIS

Climate Change Is Harming Human Health

It is an established fact that climate change is harming physical, mental, spiritual, and community health and well-being through the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme events, increasing cases of infectious and vector-borne diseases, and declines in food and water quality and security. Climate-related hazards will continue to grow, increasing morbidity and mortality across all regions of the US .

Extreme Heat

In recent decades, rising temperatures have increased heat-related health impacts in the US (Figures 21.8, 22.9, 25.3, 26.2, 27.8, 28.7; KM 2.2).12 Higher temperatures are associated with adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, mental health impacts, and increased emergency room visits and hospitalizations related to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, electrolyte imbalance, renal failure, and respiratory outcomes.13,14,15 Heat-related health impacts are greatest among children, adults over age 65, those with disabilities, people with mental health or substance-use disorders; and those who are pregnant, lack access to cooling, or engage in outdoor labor and activities (Figure 15.1).13,16,17,18,19 Black, Latinx, Asian, historically redlined, and urban communities are disproportionately exposed to heat, as are those with low wealth and people experiencing homelessness (Figures 12.4, 12.6; KM 22.2);20,21,22 these groups also report being more worried about heat risks.23,24,25 Certain medications for management of cardiovascular conditions and mental health disorders may accentuate heat-health risk.26,27 Heat-related death and illness will continue to increase unless climate change adaptation and mitigation policies are implemented (KM 15.3).28,29

URL
Alternative text
Heat and Health Equity
Infographic illustrates the interaction of heat and health equity, as described in the text and caption. Figure is divided into four quadrants labeled clockwise from top left as Location, Social and Racial Factors, Compound Risks, and Economics. Each has an illustration and two examples of unequal impacts, as follows. 1) Location is illustrated with a street map of an unidentified city and the examples are: Historically redlined communities (BIPOC and low-wealth communities) are often hotter than other neighborhoods; and access to cooling centers is more limited in some areas. 2) Social and racial factors, illustrated by a photo of a woman with her hand on her forehead, lists these examples: certain populations are more vulnerable to extreme heat and have less access to healthcare; and socially isolated individuals may have less access to cooling centers. 3) Compound risks, illustrated with a photo of power lines, lists these examples: COVID-19 protocols reduced the accessibility and effectiveness of cooling centers; and disadvantaged populations are more at risk for heat-related illnesses during power outages. 4) Economics, illustrated with a photo of a multi-story brick building in which many of the windows have air-conditioning units, lists these examples: energy costs and the costs of repairs limit the ability to afford air-conditioning; and low-wealth residents often live in homes that provide less protection against extreme heat.
Heat does not impact all communities equally.
Figure 15.1. While anyone can be impacted by heat, location, economics, compound risks, and social and racial factors influence who is most at risk. These impacts disproportionately affect BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color) communities as well as communities with low wealth. Figure credit: CDC, University of Colorado, NOAA NCEI, and CISESS NC. Image credits (clockwise from top left): NIEHS/Kelly Government Solutions and USGS/ASRC Federal Data Solutions; FG Trade/E+ via Getty Images; YinYang/E+ via Getty Images; Marc Dufresne/iStock via Getty Images.

Drought

Among weather and climate disasters in the US over the last 40 years that have caused more than a billion dollars of economic loss, drought is responsible for the second-highest number of climate-related deaths—approximately 99 per year (Figure A4.9).30 However, these statistics probably underreport the total number of deaths, as these estimates account only for heat-related mortality that accompanies droughts.31 There is growing evidence of an association between drought and increased mortality in adults ages 25–64 in both rural and urban populations.32,33 Drought can worsen air quality, resulting in adverse health outcomes such as increased cardiovascular and pulmonary disease and premature death (KM 4.2).34,35 It can also decrease water quantity and quality, which can cause increased exposure to heavy metals, bacteria, and other harmful contaminants (KMs 30.2, 30.2).36,37,38 Because farmers rely on the land for their livelihood, drought during the growing season is associated with worsening mental health among rural US farmers (KMs 11.2, 22.4).39

Wildfires

FOCUS ON

Western Wildfires

Climate change is leading to larger and more severe wildfires in the western United States, bringing acute and chronic impacts both near and far from the flames. Wildfires have significant public health, socioeconomic, and ecological implications for the Nation.

Read More

Wildfire activity has significantly increased over the last few decades, especially in the western US (KM 14.2; Figure 28.9; Focus on Western Wildfires). Roughly half of the increase in burned areas in the US can be attributed to a warming climate.40 Wildfires and resulting poor air quality can cause disruptions to a person’s life, including loss of livelihood and displacement, and can lead to multiple adverse health effects, including death, illnesses, injuries, adverse reproductive outcomes, poor mental health consequences, and declines in psychosocial well-being.41,42,43,44 Exposure to smoke from wildfires is associated with emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths.45,46,47,48,49

Infectious Diseases

Climate change is expected to alter the distribution, abundance, and seasonality of pathogens and their associated infections (Figure 15.2; Focus on COVID-19 and Climate Change).50,51,52,53 The range of vampire bats in Texas and Florida is expected to increase due to rising temperatures, which can lead to increased human rabies exposure.54,55 Exposure to rabies and other zoonoses like brucellosis and toxoplasmosis is also of increasing concern in Alaska, especially for residents who practice subsistence hunting and gathering (KM 29.1).56 In the eastern US, exposure to the amoeba (Naegleria fowleri) that causes primary amebic meningoencephalitis has been documented farther north.57 Environmental fungal diseases like blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis (Valley fever), cryptococcosis, and histoplasmosis are expected to be impacted by climate change.58,59,60 Valley fever is expected to spread northward as drought and temperatures increase (KM 28.4). Case numbers are projected to increase by 220% by the end of the century under a very high scenario (RCP8.5).61 Valley fever tends to afflict construction and agricultural workers,62,63,64 and the disease disproportionately impacts Black and Latinx populations, possibly due to occupational exposure.65,66,67,68

Lyme disease and other tick-borne diseases account for approximately 80% of all reported cases of vector-borne diseases in the US69,70 and have steadily increased over the last 20 years due to multiple factors, including climate change (Figure 24.8).71,72,73 Increased distribution and abundance of ticks are projected to increase human disease cases.74,75,76,77,78,79 Climate change has contributed to the expansion over the last 20–30 years of the Lone Star tick80,81,82,83,84 and the Gulf Coast tick, which transmit multiple pathogens.85 Climate change extends ticks’ seasonal activity, prolonging human exposure.76,86,87,88,89

Mosquito-borne pathogen spread is influenced by weather, climate, and social factors.90,91,92 Climate change alters the diversity and distribution of mosquito vectors of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya viruses.93,94,95,96,97 Dengue is currently a risk in the contiguous US, the US Caribbean, Hawaiʻi, and US-affiliated Pacific Islands (KMs 23.1, 30.2).98,99 Increasing weather variability (KM 4.1) may increase West Nile virus transmission. Regional West Nile virus projections indicate geographic expansion in the Northeast over the next 50 years due to climate-related changes in mosquito population distribution (KMs 22.2, 24.3).100,101,102 Mosquito-borne transmission of other encephalitis viruses has been sporadic in the last decade and may increase as climate change extends seasonality and expands habitat suitability for mosquito species.103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111

URL
Alternative text
Regional Examples of Climate-Sensitive Infectious Diseases
Maps of the contiguous United States, Alaska, US Caribbean, Hawaii, and US-Affiliated Pacific Islands provide regional examples of climate-sensitive disease risk, as described in the text and caption. The top legend on the right lists the following disease vectors and hosts, along with their associated diseases: mosquitoes (e.g., West Nile virus encephalitis, dengue fever); ticks (e.g., Lyme disease, Rocky Mountain spotted fever); bats, cattle, and other animals (e.g., rabies, brucellosis, other zoonotic diseases). The bottom legend lists the following environmental pathogens and associated diseases: Vibrio bacteria (vibriosis); Coccidioides fungus (Valley fever); Histoplasma fungus (histoplasmosis); Cryptococcus fungus (cryptococcosis); and Naegleria fowleri amoeba (primary amebic meningoencephalitis). Icons on maps link regions to disease vectors and hosts and environmental pathogens, as follows: US Caribbean, Hawaii, and US-Affiliated Pacific Islands: mosquitoes. Alaska: Bats, cattle, and other animals. Northwest: Coccidioides and Cryptococcus fungi. Southwest: mosquitoes, ticks, and Coccidioides fungus. Northern Great Plains: mosquitoes and ticks. Southern Great Plains: mosquitoes; bats, cattle, and other animals; and Naegleria fowleri amoeba. Midwest: mosquitoes, ticks, and Histoplasma fungus. Southeast: mosquitoes, ticks, and Vibrio bacteria. Northeast: mosquitoes, ticks.
Some climate-sensitive infectious diseases are expected to see expanded geographic range and extended seasonality.
Figure 15.2. The map shows select examples of regional climate-sensitive infectious diseases, based on recent changes in geographic range or incidence. Some regions will experience increases in tick- and mosquito-borne diseases, zoonotic diseases, and pathogens, both in geographic area and extended seasonality. Figure credit: Los Alamos National Laboratory, CDC, Columbia University, University of Arizona, and University of Colorado.

Food and Water

Climate change negatively impacts water quality, water security, food security, and nutrition, which harms health, particularly for communities that rely on agriculture, fishing, and subsistence lifestyles (KMs 4.1, 11.2, 22.2, 23.1, 25.3). For example, the 2021 Pacific Northwest heatwave affected the livelihoods of farmers and Tribes by damaging crops and causing a die-off of mussels, clams, and oysters.112

The incidence of certain diseases caused by foodborne and waterborne pathogens is expected to increase due to climate conditions that promote bacterial growth and geographic spread. For instance, vibriosis is a disease caused by ingesting Vibrio bacteria in contaminated shellfish or water sources. Symptoms range from food poisoning–like illness to death. Climate change–related vibriosis cases are projected to increase by 51% by 2090 under an intermediate scenario (RCP4.5)113 due to increasing Vibrio populations in warming waters, changing salinity, sea level rise–related coastal changes, and flooding (KM 9.1).113,114,115,116,117

Mental and Spiritual Health

Extreme weather events, wildfires, and slow-onset disasters (e.g., drought, sea level rise) can contribute to adverse mental and spiritual health outcomes. These harms may arise from forced displacement and migration (KM 20.3), trauma, loss of sense of place and belonging, and disruption of livelihoods, lifeways, and social support systems.118 Under-resourced communities bear greater mental and spiritual health burdens (KMs 22.2, 25.2, 27.5).

Mental health conditions including anxiety, depression, and suicide have become more prevalent in the US in the past decade, especially among adolescents.119,120 Climate change may increase these mental health burdens.55 Greater need for mental health services and psychiatric medications, as well as higher rates of anxiety, have been reported following major hurricanes (KM 23.1). For example, one in six mothers with low income experienced continued post-traumatic stress symptoms 12 years after Hurricane Katrina.121,122,123,124 Many survivors of California’s deadliest wildfire, the 2018 Camp Fire, experienced post-traumatic stress, depression, and anxiety42 related to home loss and community disruption. Extreme heat exposure has been linked to worsening mental health, including suicide and interpersonal violence.7,125

Degradation or destruction of culturally significant places and flora and fauna relatives (KM 24.2),126,127 shifts in timing of ceremonial practices, disruption of intergenerational teachings and sharing of knowledge and wisdom, and loss of place-based spirituality and traditional livelihoods and lifeways put spiritual health at risk, especially for Indigenous communities.128,129

Box 15.1. Child and Adolescent Mental Health

Compared to previous generations, US children born in 2020 are more likely to experience climate-related adverse childhood events (ACEs) from damage to their homes, schools, and communities.130 Children with four or more ACEs have 3- to 6-fold greater odds of having anxiety, depression, and substance use disorders and 30-fold greater odds of attempting suicide, in addition to greater physical health risks.131 Concerns about a potentially uninhabitable world due to climate change can result in “eco-anxiety.” Nearly 60% of 1,000 surveyed US adolescents reported anxiety about climate change, and nearly half believe that “humanity is doomed” (Figure 15.3),132 despite evidence to the contrary (Chs. 1, 2, 31, 32). Psychological resilience training along with mental health care may lessen anxiety and promote engagement on climate change.5,7,133,134 Youth climate education programs have focused on empowerment with the intent to reframe threats from climate change as opportunities to pursue solutions.135,136

URL
Alternative text
Children’s Mental Health
An infographic describes the results of a survey given to 1,000 children in the United States, as described in the text and caption. The survey asked participants to rate, on a scale from 1 to 5, how worried they are about climate change impacts to people and the planet. From least to most worried, 9% of participants selected not worried, 14% selected a little worried, 29% selected moderately worried, 27% selected very worried, and 19% selected extremely worried. 2% did not respond. 26% of participants also reported that climate change had a negative effect on their daily life and functioning.
Out of 1,000 children and young people surveyed in the US, a majority expressed worry about climate change impacts to people and the planet.
Figure 15.3. The figure shows the level of worry about climate change among young people ages 16–25. In the US, 46% of respondents said they were “very” or “extremely” worried about climate change, and 26% of respondents indicated that their feelings about climate change negatively affected their daily life and functioning, including at least one of the following: eating, concentrating, work, school, sleeping, spending time in nature, playing, having fun, and relationships.132 Figure credit: Boston Children’s Hospital, NOAA NCEI, and CISESS NC.
Art × Climate
Gouache painting shows a young person with lighter skin and long hair dressed in red tennis shoes, jeans, and a sleeveless t-shirt sitting on the floor and drawing in a spiral-bound notebook. Behind the figure is a painting of a factory complex spewing smoke, while in front are broken green crayons on the floor.

Amelia K.
Youth Entry, Grade 10

Cautionary tale
(2023, gouache)

Artist’s statement: In my piece, I focused on air pollution and fossil fuels. I showed factories pumping toxic gasses and fuels into the air. I also included a figure drawing childlike images of factors that have or will be destroyed by climate change. Broken green crayons symbolize the destruction of nature as climate change worsens. This is a completely possible future for our planet, with bumblebee death tolls rising due to climate change and clean water becoming inaccessible for the less fortunate. Without action this problem will only worsen.

View the full Art × Climate gallery.

Artworks and artists’ statements are not official Assessment products.

Compounding and Cascading Hazards

Multiple climate-related extreme events that occur concurrently or in rapid succession (KM 2.3; Focus on Compound Events) can result in greater health impacts than singular events and limit the ability of individuals and communities to effectively prepare for, manage, and recover from these events. A singular event that cascades across multiple sectors or regions can result in compounded adverse health consequences. Examples include back-to-back heatwaves, heatwaves during wildfires, drinking-water contamination after flooding, and vector-control program breakdowns during and after flooding.137 During 2005–2013, windstorms combined with power outages increased emergency department visits, hospital stays, and injury costs in New York, particularly for older individuals and Medicaid recipients.138

Occupational Safety and Health Impacts

Climate-related increases in temperature are associated with increases in occupational injuries and occupational exposure to heat, potentially resulting in illness or death (KM 11.2).139,140,141 Between 2011 and 2019, an average of 3,500 heat-related injuries, resulting in 38 fatalities per year, were reported to OSHA.139 Between 2001 and 2018, higher-temperature days in California were associated with greatest increased risk of occupational injuries to men, lower-income workers, and young workers. Repeated heat stress coupled with dehydration in occupational environments is a risk factor for the development of kidney disease.142 Extreme heat is expected to lead to lost labor hours, particularly for workers of color, individuals with low income, and those without a high school diploma. Additionally, these groups are more likely to live in areas where labor is most impacted by extreme heat.143 Projected estimates of annual lost wages due to unsafe heat range from $19.2 billion to $46 billion (in 2022 dollars) by midcentury (under an intermediate scenario [RCP4.5]).144,145 Industries where workers experience increased risk of heat-related mortality include agriculture (KM 11.2), construction, transportation and warehousing, and waste management.139 Workers can also face unsafe heat in indoor environments not equipped with adequate climate control.139 Worker safety is also affected by climate change impacts on economic opportunity and wealth (KM 19.3), exposure to infectious diseases (Focus on COVID-19 and Climate Change), extreme events (Focus on Western Wildfires), and increased mental health risks.146


Systemic Racism and Discrimination Exacerbate Climate Impacts on Human Health

Climate change unequivocally worsens physical, mental, spiritual, and community health and well-being, as well as social inequities. It is an established fact that climate-related impacts disproportionately harm communities and people who have been marginalized. These include BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color), individuals and communities with low wealth, women, people with disabilities or chronic diseases, sexual and gender minorities, and children.

Community Health and Health Equity

Climate hazards negatively impact physical, mental, and community health.147 Although extreme weather threatens all communities (Figure 15.3), health-related burdens are experienced more acutely by BIPOC and low-wealth communities that have been under-resourced and overburdened (KM 19.1; Figure 19.2).143,148,149 Climate change creates intergenerational inequities as younger generations must endure more extreme weather events than older ones (Figure 15.4). Valuation of intergenerational inequity can inform resilience and mitigation investments. Climate change is a threat multiplier, interacting with and magnifying other life-threatening stressors (Figure 15.5).150 Fenceline communities—those located adjacent to hazardous industrial facilities, which are disproportionately BIPOC and low-wealth—face higher risks from chemical and industrial disasters following extreme weather.151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162 Hazardous sites, threatened by flooding and sea level rise, exacerbate climate-related health inequities to BIPOC and communities with low wealth (KM 9.2).163 Additionally, about 70% of Superfund sites—locations contaminated by hazardous materials designated for clean-up—are located within one mile of federally assisted housing, which disproportionately houses people of color, individuals with low wealth, and those with disabilities.164

URL
Alternative text
Intergenerational Inequity
A grouped bar chart shows how many more climate hazards a person born in 2020 will experience during their lifetime, on average, compared to a person born in 1965. The y-axis shows the number of additional events as a multiplier, ranging from 0 to up to 5 times as many events. For each of six climate hazards, color-coded bars are used to indicate projected multipliers for three different levels of global warming above preindustrial levels: 2.7, 4.3, and 6.3 degrees Fahrenheit, indicated by the colors yellow, orange, and red, respectively. For each hazard, bars are arranged by increasing warming level from left to right. Numbers above each bar give the specific multiplier value. The projected multipliers for each hazard are as follows: Wildfires, 1.3, 1.6, and 1.6. River floods, 0.8, 1.4, and 1.7. Crop failure: 1.0, 1.0, and 1.1. Tropical cyclones, 1.2, 2.1, and 2.2. Drought, 1.4, 2.1, and 2.0. Heatwaves, 2.1, 3.8, and 4.7.
The number of climate hazards a person born in North America will experience during their lifetime depends on how much Earth warms above preindustrial levels
Figure 15.4. People born in North America in 2020, on average, will be exposed to more climate-related hazards compared to people born in 1965, an indication of intergenerational inequity. Figure credit: Boston Children’s Hospital, NOAA NCEI, and CISESS NC.

Food and Water Systems

Disruptions to food and water quality pose challenges to human health and disproportionately affect BIPOC communities, households with low wealth, single-parent households, and children (KM 11.2; Box 23.1).165,166 In 2020, 10.5% of US households were food insecure, with higher rates reported among populations that have been marginalized.165 There are growing concerns about aging or inadequate water infrastructure,167 especially among households, including many in the Navajo Nation, who experience unequal access to piped and treated drinking water and who are dependent on hauling large quantities of water from nearby facilities.168 Chemical, physical, and microbial contaminants (e.g., algal blooms and the toxins that cause paralytic shellfish poisoning) threaten water supplies under drought conditions and high temperatures (KM 22.2), which is of particular concern among Indigenous populations who rely on subsistence fishing (KMs 10.1, 28.1, 29.1).

Healthcare Access and Delivery

Climate-related extreme events have resulted in reductions in healthcare access and an increase in illness and death that can extend for months after the acute event, especially for communities with low wealth (KM 23.1).169,170 Extreme events can disrupt care for chronic physical and mental health conditions. After hurricanes, risk of death among patients with lung cancer rises in proportion to the length of disaster declarations,171 and delays in access to dialysis after Hurricane Sandy were associated with more emergency department visits and mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease.172 Infrastructure and transportation failures contribute to poor health outcomes due to closures, lack of electricity or clean water sources, and/or road failures that prevent access to healthcare providers.173

Tribal and Indigenous Peoples’ Health

Tribal and Indigenous Peoples are disproportionately impacted by climate change, and they often equate the health of their people, culture, and traditional practices to the health of the environment (KMs 16.1, 29.1, 27.5, 30.2).127,174,175 In addition to enduring the historical injustices of colonization, forced relocation, and land dispossession,176 Indigenous Peoples are among the first to face the spiritual, physical, and mental health threats and impacts of climate change. This undermines their ability to maintain and access their cultural and economic lifeways and worsens community-wide vulnerabilities, such as limited water availability for use by humans, animals, and plants (KM 16.1).129 Climate-related hazards such as flooding, erosion, sea level rise, and melting ice may lead to impassable roads in remote parts of Tribal territories, thereby widening gaps in the ability to access adequate healthcare (KM 29.2; Focus on Risks to Supply Chains).177

Persons with Disabilities’ Health

Climate change disproportionately and differentially harms the health of persons with disabilities, magnifies existing health and socioeconomic inequalities, creates unique challenges, and compounds disparities due to multiple discrimination.178 During climate disasters, persons with disabilities are at heightened risk of mortality and injury, and they experience disruptions accessing assistive devices, medication, dialysis, other health services, and social support.178,179 During periods of higher ambient temperatures and heatwaves, persons with physical and mental disabilities experience adverse health impacts, increased emergency room visits, and higher rates of mortality; cooling measures may be physically or financially inaccessible.178,180 Persons with disabilities are also at elevated risk of exposure to chronic air pollution, as they disproportionately live in neighborhoods with heightened exposure to fine particulate matter due to lower wealth, higher unemployment, and undereducation relative to nondisabled peers.181

African American and Latinx Peoples’ Health

Climate change has had and will continue to have disproportionate adverse health impacts on communities with low wealth and BIPOC communities, worsening already-existing health disparities. Discriminatory policies and practices in housing, education, and siting of polluting facilities, including disinvestment in infrastructure and healthcare, amplify adverse climate-related health impacts (KM 22.2; Focus on Risks to Supply Chains).150 Latinx populations, compared to other demographic groups, are 43% more likely to live in areas that will experience the highest labor reduction hours due to extreme high temperatures (with 2°C (3.6°F) of global warming by 2085–2095 compared to the 1986–2005 reference period).143,145 African Americans are also expected to face disproportionately greater risks from climate change. African Americans and individuals with low income face higher risks of death from climate-driven floods and air pollution compared to White people (Box 4.2).143 People of color are disproportionately exposed to greenhouse gas co-pollutants like small particulate matter and face adverse health impacts as a result.182,183 Due to housing discrimination and redlining, African Americans are more likely to live in neighborhoods with fewer trees and more pavement, suffer disproportionately from heat-related deaths, be exposed to worse air quality, and experience higher rates of asthma-related emergency room visits (KM 22.2; Figures 12.4, 12.6),184,185,186,187 all of which are compounded by climate change. Latinx and other BIPOC communities face similar challenges (KM 14.3).188,189

Women’s Health

Women disproportionately experience the burden of climate change because of unique mental, sexual, and reproductive health needs that intersect with existing social, racial, and economic disparities. Women, and particularly women of color, are more likely to live in communities with low wealth,190,191 which is associated with food insecurity192 and exposure to particulate matter, extreme heat,2 and climate-related disasters.193,194 Pregnant cisgender women are particularly vulnerable because exposure to heat, particulate matter, and disaster-associated stressors leads to poor pregnancy outcomes, including miscarriages and low birth weight.1,195 These factors contribute to maternal mortality, which is more prevalent in the US than in any other developed nation.196 These outcomes are more likely in groups that have been marginalized, particularly Black pregnant people,197,198 exacerbating existing social inequities.

In utero exposure to maternal stress during climate-related disasters is linked to subsequent psychiatric disorders in early childhood.199 Additionally, women have higher caregiving burdens and decreased healthcare access, which makes recovering from climate-driven exposures more difficult. Transgender women may be required to stay in male-only shelters during climate-related disasters, negatively impacting their mental and physical health.200,201

Sexual and Gender Minorities’ Health

Sexual and gender minorities (SGMs) face social, economic, and health disparities and, as a result, experience greater risk of harm from climate change. SGMs are found in all populations, including frontline communities, and can experience compounding disparities and impacts on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. In 2015, Black and Latinx transgender individuals were more than three times as likely as the overall US population to be living below the poverty line (KMs 19.1, 23.1).190 Indigenous SGMs face heightened health disparities as climate change continues to impact lifeways and economies.202 SGMs may lack access to critical services during extreme events and are often not included in disaster preparedness and response plans due to discrimination and institutional structures that prioritize the needs of cisgender, heterosexual individuals;200 may not recognize “chosen families”; and increasingly rely on faith-based organizations as first responders during disasters, which in some cases have blamed SGMs for devastating hurricanes and wildfires as a punishment from God.193 These discriminatory beliefs have led some SGMs to not seek services at faith-based organizations for fear of being turned away or their SGM status being outed.203 Because of religious bias, healthcare workers may also refuse to provide health services to or discriminate against SGMs during disasters.204

URL
Alternative text
Social Vulnerability and Climate Hazards
A three-panel figure illustrates social vulnerability and climate hazards (monetary losses only) through maps of the contiguous US, Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico. The top left panel shows county-level social vulnerability for 2015 to 2019 as high (red), medium (pink), or low (pale pink), with one area in northern New Mexico shown as having no data. The heaviest concentrations of high social vulnerability are in Puerto Rico, Alaska, northern Arizona, western New Mexico, parts of Maine, and the Southeast. Hawaii, the Northeast, and the Midwest are primarily medium. Much of the Northern Great Plains is low, although some areas such as central South Dakota and much of Montana are medium or high. The Northwest is mostly a mix of medium and high. The top right panel shows trends in climate-sensitive hazard losses over the period 2000 to 2019 as either increasing (dark blue), decreasing (light blue), or no trend (gray). Losses are increasing across much of the Carolinas, Coastal Texas, Michigan, central Alaska, South Dakota, and northern parts of New York State, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine. The western US shows a mix of increasing and decreasing trends, as does Puerto Rico. Hawaii is seeing mostly decreasing losses. The bottom center panel shows combined social vulnerability and climate-sensitive hazard losses. The legend indicates increasing losses combined with progressively higher rates of social vulnerability (pale pink to dark red), or decreasing losses combined with progressively higher rates of social vulnerability (pale blue to dark blue). Areas with both increasing losses and high rates of vulnerability include central Alaska, northern Arizona, western New Mexico, Central Puerto Rico, and a number of counties in the Northwest, Northern Great Plains, and Southeast. Areas with decreasing losses and high social vulnerability include much of Puerto Rico, western Alaska, Mississippi, southern Alabama, and central Florida.
Some highly vulnerable areas also have high economic losses from climate hazards.
Figure 15.5. Panel (a) maps counties based on their Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI) scores for the period 2015–2019. SoVI uses 29 different inputs that characterize underlying socioeconomic and demographic factors, and the index is classified (high, medium, low) using standard deviations. Panel (b) shows counties with an increasing trend in climate-sensitive hazard losses (2000–2019) based on data from the Arizona State University/ASU Spatial Hazard Events and Losses Database for the US (SHELDUS). The data is based on property losses and excludes injuries and fatalities from climate-sensitive hazard losses. Exclusion of fatality (especially from heat) explains why some areas of the Southwest appear to have a seemingly decreasing loss trend. The composite map (c) identifies counties with high social vulnerability that have less capacity to prepare for, respond to, and rebound from increasing climate-related losses. SoVI does not fully capture the disproportionate impacts of climate hazards in specific neighborhoods, populations, and cultural groups within a county, nor does it account for risk created by historic marginalization. Figure credit: University of Central Florida, Arizona State University, NOAA NCEI, and CISESS NC.


Timely, Effective, and Culturally Appropriate Adaptation and Mitigation Actions Protect Human Health

In every sector of society, implementing timely, effective, and culturally appropriate adaptation measures , creating climate-resilient health systems , and preventing the release of greenhouse gases can protect human health and improve health equity .

Risk Management and Integrated Approaches

Proactive and continuous risk management to protect at-risk groups and healthcare facilities is critical to human health and well-being (KM 31.3). This includes integrated approaches that mainstream health into food systems (KM 11.1), infrastructure, water, and sanitation policies. Mitigation options with significant health benefits include reducing point-source (e.g., coal-fired power plants) and mobile-source emissions, increasing active transport (e.g., walking), and increasing consumption of vegetables, legumes, fruits, and nuts (KMs 13.3, 32.4).205 The economic value of avoided hospitalizations and premature deaths from mitigation activities is larger than the cost of implementation.29

Climate-Resilient and Sustainable Health Systems

A climate-resilient health system can “anticipate, respond to, cope with, recover from, and adapt to” climate change to improve the health of communities (KMs 18.2, 19.2).206,207 Focusing on equity, proactively addressing mental health needs, and linking to community health resources such as community health workers and long-term support and services can create a climate-resilient health system. Climate-related hazards routinely stress and disrupt healthcare systems and threaten access to healthcare for many. For example, a flooding event in 2019 damaged hospitals and disrupted access to healthcare across the central US.208 Many hospitals (9.3%), nursing homes (10.2%), and pharmacies (12.1%) are at risk of flooding.209 The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the lack of resilience of the healthcare system when confronted with a large, prolonged increase in healthcare needs (Focus on COVID-19 and Climate Change). Climate-sensitive health problems are linked to a significant economic burden on the healthcare system. There are numerous tools to identify threats and vulnerabilities to healthcare systems—such as the US Department of Health and Human Services’ Sustainable and Climate Resilient Health Care Facilities Initiative—with frameworks to guide planning and implementation.210

Healthcare systems can play an important role in GHG reduction. The healthcare sector is responsible for 8.5% of US GHG emissions (Figure 19.5).211,212 Transitioning to clean energy sources and introducing sustainable technologies into healthcare systems would reduce these emissions and associated health harms (KM 32.4).

Benefits of Reducing Air Pollution

Air pollution is a leading cause of premature death worldwide (KM 14.1).213 It has substantial impacts on lung, heart, and brain health; cancer; and mental health.214 Reducing GHG emissions and human-caused air pollution would save lives and decrease the burden on the healthcare system (KMs 14.5, 32.4; Figure 32.15).

Disease Surveillance

FOCUS ON

COVID-19 and Climate Change

Climate change can increase the likelihood of pandemics like COVID-19 and worsen their impacts. Climate-driven changes in ecosystems increase the risk of emerging infectious diseases by altering interactions among humans, pathogens, and animals and changing social and biological susceptibility to infection.

Read More

Implementing surveillance programs for climate-sensitive infectious diseases and non-infectious health outcomes (e.g., heat stroke, respiratory disease, mental and behavior health indicators) is an important adaptation measure. The COVID-19 pandemic illustrated the need for modernization of the US surveillance system and the role of innovative surveillance strategies such as wastewater testing and community-based participatory surveillance (Focus on COVID-19 and Climate Change). Monitoring disease case counts, corresponding indicators (animal health and vector populations), and health outcomes facilitates identifying seasonal trends, responses to climate and environmental variability, geographic hotspots for diseases, and new or reemerging threats.65,215,216 Enhanced disease surveillance identifies populations most at risk for contracting a disease and improves health by raising disease awareness and reducing time to diagnosis and treatment.217 This increases capacity to plan for and prevent disease spread or outbreaks, such as by creating predictive models of disease transmission, implementing vector abatement programs, and developing and stockpiling vaccines and pharmaceuticals.101,218,219,220

Extreme Heat

Increasing temperatures, urbanization, and an aging population (KM 2.2)221,222 can result in increased heat-related deaths (KM 2.2).221,222 Limiting warming to 1.5°C (2.7°F) above preindustrial levels (compared to 3°C, or 5.4°F) and timely adaptations could substantially decrease heat-related deaths, especially in cities.223,224,225,226 Adaptations range from ensuring equitable access to cool spaces and reducing social isolation to augmenting heat warning systems and improving green infrastructure (KMs 12.3, 12.4).224

Air-conditioning access is limited for unhoused populations and households with low wealth. High electricity costs prevent effective use of air-conditioning.227 Poor self-reported health and reduced life expectancy are more prevalent where families spend a large proportion of household income on residential energy.228 Government programs can help families reduce their energy costs.229 Home weatherization can improve health conditions and reduce healthcare costs while reducing GHG emissions, providing societal benefits greater than the implementation cost (KM 5.3).230,231 There are self-reported health benefits from energy retrofits in households with low wealth.232

Increased air-conditioning use can exacerbate the urban heat island effect by transferring hot air from buildings to the outdoor environment (Ch. 12; Figure 12.4) and can increase electricity-related emissions of GHGs and other air pollutants.233 Buildings that rely on air-conditioning may become dangerously hot during prolonged power outages.234,235,236,237,238 Sustainable cooling strategies are in development, such as energy-efficient systems (e.g., heat pumps and fans) and affordable passive cooling (e.g., night-flush ventilation).239,240,241,242

Wildfires

Under a range of future climate scenarios, wildfire pollutant emissions are expected to increase and result in significant health burdens.243 Integrated wildfire management and adaptation strategies are critical to reducing deaths and illnesses, as wildfire risk cannot be eliminated. Proactive and effective management of fuel loads (e.g., through prescribed and cultural burning) can reduce wildfire size and intensity, but there may be unintended health consequences.244 Strategies to reduce wildland fire smoke exposure include personal actions and community-level interventions (KM 14.2).245 Early warning systems identify areas and populations experiencing higher smoke exposure on a near-real-time basis.246,247

Art × Climate
Painting in watercolor, charcoal, and gunpowder residue shows an abstract pattern with blotches of black, gray, white, yellow, green, and pink.

Michele Colburn
Where There's Smoke
(2021, watercolors, gunpowder residue, charcoal on archival paper)

Artist’s statement: In the summer of 2021, I created a work Where There's Smoke while wildfires raged uncontrolled in California. I have lived in Colorado and Arizona in my life and am aware of such natural events, but also know that those of late are more dangerous and larger due to climate change. It was devastation that surpassed anything I had witnessed in my lifetime.

View the full Art × Climate gallery.

Artworks and artists’ statements are not official Assessment products.

Vector-Borne Diseases

Climate change is a significant contributing factor to the increase in vector-borne disease cases reported over the last 20 years.71,72,73 To adapt to these changing risks, new technologies to prevent transmission of vector-borne diseases are urgently needed, as traditional control measures, including insecticides, are rapidly becoming ineffective.71,248,249,250 Recent advances include vaccines, spatial repellents, genetically modified mosquitoes, and Wolbachia (a naturally occurring bacteria that reduces transmission of viruses such as dengue).

However, these novel adaptations are not yet operational due to funding, regulatory status, and infrastructure needs. Buy-in from communities and decision-makers is critical to ensure that emerging strategies can be utilized to protect health.92,218,251,252,253,254 Coupling novel strategies with well-established community engagement practices, such as remediating vector habitat and increasing personal protective measures, can effectively reduce risk and empower communities.255,256

Mental and Spiritual Health

Actions to support community social cohesion and cultural continuance, establish trusted and effective communication systems, and ensure that community members and/or officials can effectively manage disasters may buffer against adverse mental health outcomes.147 A personal sense of agency to take climate action can reduce adverse mental health outcomes during extreme events. It can provide hope for survival and contribute to greater participation in community responses to climate change, which may also improve mental health resilience.257

Community-Level Resilience and Adaptation Strategies to Build Capacity

Communities, connected through relationships and practices,258 have unique priorities, traditions, and histories relevant to adaptation.259 Many communities are already making proactive intergenerational adaptation decisions to reduce exposure to climate impacts, build capacity, and enhance healing and self-determination in the face of historical traumas (Figure 15.6).260 Many Indigenous Peoples in the US practice cultural burning, a fire management approach that promotes ecosystem resilience and growth of culturally important medicinal plants129,261 while also serving as an eco-centric adaptation strategy for improved planetary health.262,263 The Swinomish Indian Tribal Community used values-driven data and community input in developing Indigenous health indicators and a climate change health assessment for adaptation decision-making; the indicators included community connection, self-determination, education, resilience, cultural use, and resource security.174,264,265

External adaptation strategies can exacerbate inequities through, for example, institutional racism, uneven distribution of adaptive capacity, and resource allocation that ignores distributive and historical injustices (KM 31.1). Adaptations (e.g., tree planting) that make an area more appealing for people with higher income could push existing residents out, resulting in eco-gentrification.266,267 There are policies and institutional barriers to implementing whole-community adaptation actions.129,268

URL
Alternative text
Indigenous-Led Disaster Recovery Actions and Improved Health Outcomes
Still image shows a woman with shoulder-length brown hair gesturing with hands, as described in text and caption. Two one-story buildings are in the background.
Louisiana Tribal leaders are upholding sovereignty and self-determination in their climate adaptation actions following hurricane damage.
Figure 15.6. Tribal leaders from coastal Louisiana shared Indigenous and local knowledge, wisdom, and experiences of the health impacts and resilience-building recovery actions following Hurricane Ida, which made landfall in coastal Louisiana in August 2021. Interviews were recorded during a convening where the Tribal leaders came together to share how Louisiana Tribes are adapting to climate change while upholding sovereignty and working to improve health outcomes. Link to videos. Image credit: ©Craig Richard and Unitarian Universalist Service Committee, in collaboration with the First People's Conservation Council of Louisiana, Lowlander Center, Livelihoods Knowledge Exchange Network, and Disaster Justice Network, July 2022.

Addressing immediate needs and developing healthier long-term outcomes that reduce inequities269 and strengthen community resilience147 involves collaboration and cooperation across multiple scales. Persons with disabilities, for example, are often excluded from adaptation and mitigation efforts,270 and there is a strong need for disability-inclusive climate planning and response.271 The most impacted communities must be included in decision-making, from visioning and planning through implementation.258,272,273

Community adaptation capacity is enhanced by building and sharing flexibility, humanity, spirituality, and resilience. To be effective, adaptation strategies must integrate workforce development into co-governance and promote institutional support systems for community-defined, -driven, and -led adaptation efforts that include a diversity of cultures, histories, lifeways, and knowledge systems.129,260,274


TRACEABLE ACCOUNTS

Process Description

Chapter authors were selected over a three-week period in August 2021. The initial discussion centered around authors who had been nominated or who had self-nominated. The chapter lead author and federal coordinating lead author then expanded the list and focused on balancing career stage, topic expertise, geographic location, and type of institution (academic, federal government, nonprofit). Once the chapter lead author had narrowed down the search, the authors were contacted. All contacted authors agreed to participate and were invited to complete the survey to be officially enrolled. The 18 authors for the Human Health chapter are subject experts in the topics selected for inclusion. Technical contributors were added as needed during the response to comments from the public and the National Academies to bring in additional data and subject-matter expertise.

Authors reviewed and evaluated scientific literature on the human health impacts of climate change, with a focus on new and emerging evidence since the Fourth National Climate Assessment (NCA4). Authors also reviewed technical inputs (submitted as part of the NCA5 process) for relevant information. The entire author team regularly met virtually to create and review chapter content; all authors participated in determining Key Messages and chapter topics and content. A public engagement workshop was held to solicit public input. The chapter was informed by workshop participants’ concerns and comments. Authors also met in person in April 2023 to continue writing and incorporating additional information in response to review comments.


KEY MESSAGES

KEY MESSAGE 15.1

Climate Change Is Harming Human Health

It is an established fact that climate change is harming physical, mental, spiritual, and community health and well-being through the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme events, increasing cases of infectious and vector-borne diseases, and declines in food and water quality and security. Climate-related hazards will continue to grow, increasing morbidity and mortality across all regions of the US .

Read about Confidence and Likelihood

Description of Evidence Base

Multiple lines of evidence demonstrate that climate change is already harming human health.69,269,275,276 Evidence indicates that extreme events and climate-related environmental changes will continue to place stress on food, water, and energy supplies (KM 2.2). This, in turn, will negatively impact the health of the US population in many ways, including reduced access to healthcare. Based on recent peer-reviewed research, this Key Message outlined the existing health impacts in the areas of extreme heat, drought, wildfires, infectious diseases, food and water quality and security, mental and spiritual health, compounding hazards, and occupational safety. Studies demonstrate that these trends will continue to increase.269,277

Evolving attribution science allows researchers to study how extreme events, and resultant health impacts, were influenced by climate change. This growing evidence line contributes to our understanding of the role of climate change in the health impacts of heatwaves, floods, droughts, and other disasters.278,279,280,281

Major Uncertainties and Research Gaps

While ample evidence demonstrates the health impacts of climate change, uncertainties remain on specific aspects of these impacts. For example, uncertainties in projections of human health outcomes in response to climate change can partially stem from the underlying human case data involved in the research, which is subject to underreporting or underdiagnosing the human case counts. Quantifying the impacts of climate change on human health is challenging due to lack of long-term surveillance and datasets; differential exposures based on location; and underlying health inequities.282 In addition, health surveillance related to extreme weather is being improved through utilization of syndromic (“real-time”) surveillance, data modernization initiatives, and integration of existing surveillance systems. Decades of research on the impacts of climate change on infectious disease illustrate the complexity of the pathways by which climate change may alter disease transmission dynamics. Uncertainties arise from geographic differences in social–behavioral–environmental interactions, vector and non-human reservoir species involved in the disease system, and difficulties in isolating the impact of climate change from other significant environmental and human-driven changes (App. 4.6).

Evidence is growing that there are emerging mosquito-borne diseases and species that are able to transmit pathogens in the US. However, not all of these are linked entirely to climate change but also to land-use change, global trade, and importation of pathogens related to travel.

There is also a growing body of evidence exploring the bionomics of mosquitoes and ticks and the pathogens they carry to better understand the underlying mechanisms by which changes in thermal conditions could increase or decrease disease risk.283

Most projection models of range do not use disease but rather vector range as the endpoint. Arizona, for example, has an abundance of the dengue virus vector Aedes aegypti, but there has been little documentation of local transmission of dengue.284,285 There is also uncertainty around how the mosquitoes and ticks themselves, as well as the pathogens they are carrying, will adapt to climate change.76

Uncertainty also stems from challenges with surveillance systems and data collection relating to heat injury and illness, especially in the occupational setting. As is the case with occupational data generally, data on and estimates of heat-related morbidity and mortality differ based on the source of the data.286,287 Some heat-related impacts may not be properly categorized as heat-related288 and may not accurately capture the location of exposure, as it may be reported either by the person’s residence or by the location where medical treatment was sought.289 Further, the Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that its accounting of occupational injuries and illness are undercounted.290,291 It is therefore challenging to estimate the true number of injuries and illnesses due to extreme heat, and heat morbidity and mortality are underreported.139 Occupational health impacts from other climate hazards may also be underreported.

Recent cold spells in Texas (e.g., February 2021) and other regions have highlighted the impacts of cold weather on communities, including fatalities that resulted from cold weather exposure and power failures.292,293 Whether such trends in cold spells will continue is uncertain,294 but colder temperatures are associated with adverse health outcomes and increase the risks of death and illness.295,296,297 Positive and negative health impacts arising from climate-related shifts in ice storms, blizzards, and cold spells are an area for future research.

There is little research on the long-term health impacts of wildfire smoke exposure in communities that face repeated wildfires or on human health harms, and associated costs, from exposure to compounding and cascading hazards. There is a lack of research exploring the pathways associated with drought and human health in the United States. The full range of mental health impacts of climate change and climate-related events is not yet fully understood.298 Additional research is needed in all of these areas, including compounding events such as drought and flooding, to better describe the pathways that affect human health.

There are important administrative, logistical, and methodological challenges in assessing mortality and morbidity common to large-scale disasters and public health emergencies of any provenance. These challenges undercut the ability of practitioners to gather, report, and use mortality and morbidity data to save lives and protect health in the wake of a public health event, from the initial devastation through the long tail of recovery. Accurate and timely information about mortality and significant morbidity related to the disaster is the cornerstone of the efforts of the disaster management enterprise and will require holistic data systems and new approaches in order to be more effective.299 Specifically, there is not a standardized methodology for counting excess deaths during and after hurricanes, which can result in an underestimation of number of deaths (Figure 23.5).300 Similarly, vector-borne, food-borne, and water-borne diseases are not fully captured in case numbers.71,301 For example, cases of the rare, and typically fatal, primary amebic meningoencephalitis from exposure to the amoeba Naegleria fowleri have been documented farther north, although this conclusion is based on limited case numbers.57 Thus, the true burden of climate-attributable health effects may not be known; more research is needed to quantify health impacts in relation to physical, mental, and spiritual health.

Description of Confidence and Likelihood

Based on multiple lines of peer-reviewed evidence, including field studies, laboratory studies, model projections, and systematic reviews, it is an established fact that climate change is negatively impacting the health of the US population. Based on the amount and quality of peer-reviewed research, it is very likely, with very high confidence, that climate-related hazards will continue to grow, increasing human health impacts across all regions of the United States. Adaptation and mitigation activities could reduce this impact and protect health; the scope and scale of these efforts will determine future confidence levels around health impacts.

KEY MESSAGE 15.2

Systemic Racism and Discrimination Exacerbate Climate Impacts on Human Health

Climate change unequivocally worsens physical, mental, spiritual, and community health and well-being, as well as social inequities. It is an established fact that climate-related impacts disproportionately harm communities and people who have been marginalized. These include BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color), individuals and communities with low wealth, women, people with disabilities or chronic diseases, sexual and gender minorities, and children.

Read about Confidence and Likelihood

Description of Evidence Base

While all people in the US face health risks linked to climate change, some populations are affected sooner and more intensely.269,302 This is because of differences in the number of and severity of exposures to climate hazards (Figure 15.5), sensitivity to these hazards, and ability to adapt (KM 20.3).99 This Key Message outlines how ample peer-reviewed literature and data indicate that some populations disproportionately face environmental injustices, including impacts from climate-related extreme events. Systemic racism, discriminatory policies, and longstanding marginalization and disenfranchisement all contribute to increased climate vulnerability and to determining who bears the most climate risk.99,303 Specifically, this Key Message outlines the peer-reviewed evidence behind climate change’s disproportionate impact in the areas of community health, food and water systems, healthcare access and delivery, Tribal and Indigenous Peoples’ health, persons with disabilities’ health, African American and Latinx peoples’ health, women’s health, and sexual and gender minorities’ health.

Major Uncertainties and Research Gaps

There is relatively little community-driven participatory research on the health impacts of climate change, which leads to a lack of full understanding of impacts on disproportionately at-risk populations. There may also be underreporting of health outcomes due to a lack of healthcare access in some communities. For example, the mechanisms causing certain demographics, such as Black and Latinx populations, to have an increased risk of contracting Valley fever are unknown. More research is needed to determine links among higher rates of occupational exposure, societal factors such as access to healthcare or health insurance, or genetics.68

There is limited data on well-water usage and quality in some states, and limited funding and capacity for water quality testing in disproportionately impacted communities.304 Similarly, there is a research gap on aspects of climate change impacts on food quality, security, and nutrition in the US, as much of the research focuses on developing countries.305,306

There is also limited research on system-wide health impacts, in which communities, ecosystems, and all living relatives depend on the holistic, intact system to survive and thrive.307 Such understanding is important to ensure that adaptation does not happen in silos or isolation but rather includes the entire living system and that the proposed actions can actually achieve the intended results; this can determine the ability not only to survive but also thrive for generations to come. This is of particular importance to Indigenous communities.

More research could increase understanding of gender disparities for women and for sexual and gender minorities.193 More research on risk factors and contextualized vulnerabilities could also provide better insights into acceptable prevention and control strategies that can be implemented to protect the health of disproportionately impacted populations. There is limited research exploring the unique vulnerabilities of women and gender minorities in pregnancy, as well as the impact on fetal outcomes.1,308,309 Some studies demonstrate that women experience more significant health consequences, but very few directly relate them to climate change specifically.197

Research gaps at the intersection of disability, climate change, and health are impeding the development of effectual climate adaptation and mitigation policies and initiatives.271,310 Participatory research is required to understand the climate impacts and health disparities experienced by the heterogeneous disability community.271 Future climate-related health research can consider compounding multiple discrimination, including persons with disabilities, African Americans, Latinx, women, children, Indigenous People, older persons, and sexual and gender minorities.178,271,310 A bottom-up approach to the development of public health responses with and by organizations of persons with disabilities may advance innovative public health approaches.271 Additional research on the health effect of heat could demonstrate effectiveness of interventions for the diverse disability community.271 Moreover, further environmental justice research inclusive of persons with physical and mental disabilities would assist climate adaptation and mitigation planning and initiatives.311 A greater proportion of persons with ambulatory and cognitive disabilities were found to reside in neighborhoods with Hurricane Harvey–induced flooding in Harris County, Texas, many in public housing in non-White neighborhoods with low wealth; such research is vital to future disaster risk-reduction strategies.312 Accurate health surveillance of morbidity and mortality among disability populations that have been marginalized, including persons with intellectual disabilities, is critical to ensuring disability-inclusive climate responses.271 Additional research would improve knowledge of climate and health impacts on the Latinx population. The use of the term Latinx in the chapter is used to reflect gender diversity and is inclusive of nonbinary, gender nonconforming, and transgender individuals. The term Latinx is primarily used by younger generations and sexual and gender minorities.313 Some literature suggests that the term should not be used because x is not common in the Spanish language, upholds a Western idea that gender neutrality is grammatically superior, and, when used to refer to all Latinx individuals, can erase Latinas similar to the way that “Latinos” does.313,314,315 Other literature suggests that use of the term allows for individuals, who are often erased and discriminated against, to self-identify as a gender outside of or between the binary or who may not have a gender at all.313 Use in this chapter is consistent with the inclusion of the sexual and gender minorities section and the CDC’s adoption of the term “Latinx” when referring to health equity.99 Additional community-based research to inform specific impacts on Latinx communities is needed.

There is limited data at the census tract level or similar geographic scale on social vulnerability and climate hazards. Figure 15.5 identifies specific counties with increasing trends in climate hazard–related economic loss that also are designated as vulnerable using the SoVI (Social Vulnerability Index), which synthesizes information across multiple variables at the county scale. It does not, however, fully capture the disproportionate impacts of climate hazards in specific neighborhoods or on specific population or cultural groups within a county, nor does it account for risk created by historic marginalization.

Furthermore, data suppression due to health privacy concerns can limit the availability of data for research on specific racial or gender groups. In addition, political sensitivities around the topic of climate change impacts on specific populations can hinder research and response.

Description of Confidence and Likelihood

It is unequivocal that some populations are already disproportionately impacted by climate change, as evidenced by multiple lines of data and peer-reviewed research that included longitudinal field studies. Research and data indicate that disproportionately affected populations include persons with disabilities, older adults, pregnant people, children, sexual and gender minorities, some communities of color, and those living in communities that have been under-resourced and over-burdened. Populations at higher risk will continue to be negatively impacted by climate change unless disparities are addressed and adaptation and mitigation strategies are targeted to benefit all communities and, in particular, those that have been marginalized.

KEY MESSAGE 15.3

Timely, Effective, and Culturally Appropriate Adaptation and Mitigation Actions Protect Human Health

In every sector of society, implementing timely, effective, and culturally appropriate adaptation measures , creating climate-resilient health systems , and preventing the release of greenhouse gases can protect human health and improve health equity .

Read about Confidence and Likelihood

Description of Evidence Base

Multiple lines of research indicate that the health of the US population benefits from adaptation and mitigation activities, including integrated approaches to mainstream health into policies such as improvements in food, infrastructure, water, and sanitation. There is growing evidence that various adaptive strategies (e.g., cooling centers, building resilient healthcare infrastructure, communication campaigns, etc.) have an impact on knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors that can improve health.269,316 For example, federal programs from the US Department of Health and Human Services (Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program) and the Department of Energy (Weatherization Assistance Program), as well as state governments, are implementing a suite of additional energy efficiency programs to help families reduce their energy costs and protect their health.229 Recent research and limited literature reviews describe and classify the level of effectiveness of various adaptations and interventions to protect health.316,317,318 This evidence informed the Key Message content related to adaptation. Additional research and evidence showing direct impact on human health outcomes would be needed to increase the confidence level to very high.

Peer-reviewed evidence indicates that strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (mitigation) can protect health by reducing future climate hazards.205 They also can increase resilience by providing co-benefits that immediately improve health.319 The economic value of avoided hospitalizations and premature deaths are of the same order of magnitude as or larger than the cost of implementing the mitigation polices.29

Major Uncertainties and Research Gaps

There are still uncertainties and research gaps around timely, effective, and culturally appropriate adaptation and mitigation actions, including in the areas of risk management and integrated approaches, community-level resilience and adaptation strategies to build capacity, climate resilient and sustainable health systems, benefits of reducing air pollution, disease surveillance, and actions to protect populations from extreme heat, wildfires, and vector-borne diseases.

Further research could help document the effectiveness of adaptation and mitigation options in both the short term and long term. This could include examining the specifics affecting the success of interventions, including enabling conditions, constraints, and barriers, as well as effective approaches to overcome challenges and to scale up effective measures. Some mitigation and adaptation activities can have unintended negative health consequences; for example, trees planted to provide shade and reduce exposure to unsafe temperatures may inadvertently increase pollen levels and pose a hazard to those with respiratory health issues such as asthma.320,321 Providing timely pollen information to clinicians, public health practitioners, and the public could increase awareness and allow at-risk individuals to take preventive measures (KM 14.4). Because pollen monitoring stations are sparsely distributed, using nontraditional data sources such as information from web searches322 and near-real-time data on symptoms of emergency department patients323 can offer alternative ways of gathering and communicating potential risks of pollen exposure.

There is also a lack of research on the effectiveness of some health-protective actions in different regions and among varying population demographics; for example, tree planting may not be a feasible strategy to provide shade in a water-scarce ecosystems such as the desert Southwest. More research would improve understanding on how individual and community-level social capital impacts the effectiveness of adaptation and mitigation strategies.324 More research would also help tailor health communication messages to specific populations, an effective strategy to protect health.325

Continuous improvements in research and modeling can help drive evidence-based public health responses to minimize illness and death.224,225,226 Climate-sensitive disease or health-outcome surveillance systems could be integrated with weather event tracking and economic cost estimates to assess the overall impact of such events.31,326

There is limited curriculum on the health impacts of climate change. Greater integration into medical school, nursing school, and public health curricula can increase awareness of the established links between climate change and health and effective adaptation and mitigation strategies to reduce these health impacts.327,328

Health departments are chronically underfunded, and most do not have the resources to prepare for and respond to the health impacts of climate change.329 Increased capacity is needed to track hazards, build community resilience, and address cascading hazards. Improved data and capacity would allow for more effective adaptation and mitigation actions to protect health. Healthcare and public health worker shortages and unstable funding limit the ability of practitioners to engage in climate change–related health protection activities.

More research is also needed on community acceptability of adaptation and mitigation interventions to ensure effectiveness and sustainability. In addition, there are still gaps in implementation science (“the scientific study of methods and strategies that facilitate the uptake of evidence-based practice and research into regular use by practitioners and policymakers”330), a practice that helps ensure interventions benefit the communities that are most impacted by climate change.99

Description of Confidence and Likelihood

In the first statement of Key Message 15.3, the author team determined that there is high confidence that human health can be protected if adaptation measures are implemented. This statement is based on multiple lines of peer-reviewed evidence and real-world examples of successful adaptation strategies. Measures such as building energy retrofits, the establishment of education and outreach programs, installation of white roofs, and improvement of equitable access to cooling centers and green spaces can help protect human health if the necessary resources to implement these strategies exist or are made available. Based on peer-reviewed literature, there is also high confidence that creating climate-resilient health systems will protect health and high confidence that mitigation efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions can protect health and improve health equity.

There is some uncertainty because it is difficult to determine future human behavioral response to the proposed adoption of adaptation and mitigation strategies. In order to improve health equity, it remains important to contextualize these strategies to specific communities, determine acceptability of strategies to specific communities prior to introduction, and investigate potential unintended consequences prior to adoption of mitigation strategies.

REFERENCES

  1. Bekkar, B., S. Pacheco, R. Basu, and N. DeNicola, 2020: Association of air pollution and heat exposure with preterm birth, low birth weight, and stillbirth in the US: A systematic review. JAMA Network Open, 3 (6), e208243. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8243
  2. Chersich, M.F., M.D. Pham, A. Areal, M.M. Haghighi, A. Manyuchi, C.P. Swift, B. Wernecke, M. Robinson, R. Hetem, M. Boeckmann, and S. Hajat, 2020: Associations between high temperatures in pregnancy and risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and stillbirths: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 371, m3811. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3811
  3. Malley, C.S., D.K. Henze, J.C.I. Kuylenstierna, H.W. Vallack, Y. Davila, S.C. Anenberg, M.C. Turner, and M.R. Ashmore, 2017: Updated global estimates of respiratory mortality in adults ≥30years of age attributable to long-term ozone exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125 (8), 087021. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp1390
  4. Obradovich, N., R. Migliorini, M.P. Paulus, and I. Rahwan, 2018: Empirical evidence of mental health risks posed by climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115 (43), 10953–10958. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801528115
  5. Palinkas, L.A. and M. Wong, 2020: Global climate change and mental health. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.023
  6. Peters, A. and A. Schneider, 2021: Cardiovascular risks of climate change. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 18 (1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-020-00473-5
  7. Thompson, R., R. Hornigold, L. Page, and T. Waite, 2018: Associations between high ambient temperatures and heat waves with mental health outcomes: A systematic review. Public Health, 161, 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2018.06.008
  8. Bailey, Z.D., J.M. Feldman, and M.T. Bassett, 2021: How structural racism works—racist policies as a root cause of US racial health inequities. New England Journal of Medicine, 384 (8), 768–773. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmms2025396
  9. Ebi, K.L., J. Vanos, J.W. Baldwin, J.E. Bell, D.M. Hondula, N.A. Errett, K. Hayes, C.E. Reid, S. Saha, J. Spector, and P. Berry, 2021: Extreme weather and climate change: Population health and health system implications. Annual Review of Public Health, 42 (1), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-012420-105026
  10. McDermott-Levy, R., M. Scolio, K.M. Shakya, and C.H. Moore, 2021: Factors that influence climate change-related mortality in the United States: An integrative review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (15), 8220. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158220
  11. Woolf, S.H., H. Schoomaker, L. Hill, and C.M. Orndahl, 2019: The social determinants of health and the decline in U.S. life expectancy: Implications for Appalachia. Journal of Appalachian Health, 1 (1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0101.02
  12. Vicedo-Cabrera, A.M., N. Scovronick, F. Sera, D. Royé, R. Schneider, A. Tobias, C. Astrom, Y. Guo, Y. Honda, D.M. Hondula, R. Abrutzky, S. Tong, M.d.S.Z.S. Coelho, P.H.N. Saldiva, E. Lavigne, P.M. Correa, N.V. Ortega, H. Kan, S. Osorio, J. Kyselý, A. Urban, H. Orru, E. Indermitte, J.J.K. Jaakkola, N. Ryti, M. Pascal, A. Schneider, K. Katsouyanni, E. Samoli, F. Mayvaneh, A. Entezari, P. Goodman, A. Zeka, P. Michelozzi, F. de’Donato, M. Hashizume, B. Alahmad, M.H. Diaz, C.D.L.C. Valencia, A. Overcenco, D. Houthuijs, C. Ameling, S. Rao, F. Di Ruscio, G. Carrasco-Escobar, X. Seposo, S. Silva, J. Madureira, I.H. Holobaca, S. Fratianni, F. Acquaotta, H. Kim, W. Lee, C. Iniguez, B. Forsberg, M.S. Ragettli, Y.L.L. Guo, B.Y. Chen, S. Li, B. Armstrong, A. Aleman, A. Zanobetti, J. Schwartz, T.N. Dang, D.V. Dung, N. Gillett, A. Haines, M. Mengel, V. Huber, and A. Gasparrini, 2021: The burden of heat-related mortality attributable to recent human-induced climate change. Nature Climate Change, 11 (6), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01058-x
  13. Ebi, K.L., A. Capon, P. Berry, C. Broderick, R. de Dear, G. Havenith, Y. Honda, R.S. Kovats, W. Ma, A. Malik, N.B. Morris, L. Nybo, S.I. Seneviratne, J. Vanos, and O. Jay, 2021: Hot weather and heat extremes: Health risks. The Lancet, 398 (10301), 698–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01208-3
  14. Thomas, N., S.T. Ebelt, A.J. Newman, N. Scovronick, R.R. D’Souza, S.E. Moss, J.L. Warren, M.J. Strickland, L.A. Darrow, and H.H. Chang, 2021: Time-series analysis of daily ambient temperature and emergency department visits in five US cities with a comparison of exposure metrics derived from 1-km meteorology products. Environmental Health, 20 (1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-021-00735-w
  15. Vaidyanathan, A., S. Saha, A.M. Vicedo-Cabrera, A. Gasparrini, N. Abdurehman, R. Jordan, M. Hawkins, J. Hess, and A. Elixhauser, 2019: Assessment of extreme heat and hospitalizations to inform early warning systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116 (12), 5420–5427. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806393116
  16. Bernstein, A.S., S. Sun, K.R. Weinberger, K.R. Spangler, P.E. Sheffield, and G.A. Wellenius, 2022: Warm season and emergency department visits to U.S. children's hospitals. Environmental Health Perspectives, 130 (1), 017001. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp8083
  17. Meade, R.D., A.P. Akerman, S.R. Notley, R. McGinn, P. Poirier, P. Gosselin, and G.P. Kenny, 2020: Physiological factors characterizing heat-vulnerable older adults: A narrative review. Environment International, 144, 105909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105909
  18. Nori-Sarma, A., S. Sun, Y. Sun, K.R. Spangler, R. Oblath, S. Galea, J.L. Gradus, and G.A. Wellenius, 2022: Association between ambient heat and risk of emergency department visits for mental health among US adults, 2010 to 2019. JAMA Psychiatry, 79 (4), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.4369
  19. O’Lenick, C.R., A. Baniassadi, R. Michael, A. Monaghan, J. Boehnert, X. Yu, M.H. Hayden, C. Wiedinmyer, K. Zhang, P.J. Crank, J. Heusinger, P. Hoel, D.J. Sailor, and O.V. Wilhelmi, 2020: A case-crossover analysis of indoor heat exposure on mortality and hospitalizations among the elderly in Houston, Texas. Environmental Health Perspectives, 128 (12), 127007. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp6340
  20. Benz, S.A. and J.A. Burney, 2021: Widespread race and class disparities in surface urban heat extremes across the United States. Earth's Future, 9 (7), e2021EF002016. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021ef002016
  21. Tuholske, C., K. Caylor, C. Funk, A. Verdin, S. Sweeney, K. Grace, P. Peterson, and T. Evans, 2021: Global urban population exposure to extreme heat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118 (41), e2024792118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024792118
  22. Wilson, B., 2020: Urban heat management and the legacy of redlining. Journal of the American Planning Association, 86 (4), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2020.1759127
  23. Hass, A.L., J.D. Runkle, and M.M. Sugg, 2021: The driving influences of human perception to extreme heat: A scoping review. Environmental Research, 197, 111173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111173
  24. Howe, P.D., J.R. Marlon, X. Wang, and A. Leiserowitz, 2019: Public perceptions of the health risks of extreme heat across US states, counties, and neighborhoods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116 (14), 6743–6748. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813145116
  25. Madrigano, J., K. Lane, N. Petrovic, M. Ahmed, M. Blum, and T. Matte, 2018: Awareness, risk perception, and protective behaviors for extreme heat and climate change in New York City. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15 (7), 1433. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071433
  26. Jacobsen, A.P., Y.C. Khiew, E. Duffy, J. O'Connell, E. Brown, P.G. Auwaerter, R.S. Blumenthal, B.S. Schwartz, and J.W. McEvoy, 2022: Climate change and the prevention of cardiovascular disease. American Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 12, 100391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2022.100391
  27. Martin-Latry, K., M.P. Goumy, P. Latry, C. Gabinski, B. Bégaud, I. Faure, and H. Verdoux, 2007: Psychotropic drugs use and risk of heat-related hospitalisation. European Psychiatry, 22 (6), 335–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.03.007
  28. Puvvula, J., A.M. Abadi, K.C. Conlon, J.J. Rennie, S.C. Herring, L. Thie, M.J. Rudolph, R. Owen, and J.E. Bell, 2022: Estimating the burden of heat-related illness morbidity attributable to anthropogenic climate change in North Carolina. GeoHealth, 6 (11), e2022GH000636. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gh000636
  29. Shindell, D., M. Ru, Y. Zhang, K. Seltzer, G. Faluvegi, L. Nazarenko, G.A. Schmidt, L. Parsons, A. Challapalli, L. Yang, and A. Glick, 2021: Temporal and spatial distribution of health, labor, and crop benefits of climate change mitigation in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118 (46), e2104061118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2104061118
  30. NCEI, 2022: U.S. Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service, National Centers for Environmental Information. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/billions/
  31. Limaye, V.S., W. Max, J. Constible, and K. Knowlton, 2019: Estimating the health-related costs of 10 climate-sensitive U.S. events during 2012. GeoHealth, 3 (9), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gh000202
  32. Abadi, A.M., Y. Gwon, M.O. Gribble, J.D. Berman, R. Bilotta, M. Hobbins, and J.E. Bell, 2022: Drought and all-cause mortality in Nebraska from 1980 to 2014: Time-series analyses by age, sex, race, urbanicity and drought severity. Science of The Total Environment, 840, 156660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156660
  33. Lynch, K.M., R.H. Lyles, L.A. Waller, A.M. Abadi, J.E. Bell, and M.O. Gribble, 2020: Drought severity and all-cause mortality rates among adults in the United States: 1968–2014. Environmental Health, 19 (1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-020-00597-8
  34. Achakulwisut, P., L.J. Mickley, and S.C. Anenberg, 2018: Drought-sensitivity of fine dust in the US Southwest: Implications for air quality and public health under future climate change. Environmental Research Letters, 13 (5), 054025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf20
  35. Bell, J.E., C.L. Brown, K. Conlon, S. Herring, K.E. Kunkel, J. Lawrimore, G. Luber, C. Schreck, A. Smith, and C. Uejio, 2018: Changes in extreme events and the potential impacts on human health. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 68 (4), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2017.1401017
  36. Lombard, M.A., J. Daniel, Z. Jeddy, L.E. Hay, and J.D. Ayotte, 2021: Assessing the impact of drought on arsenic exposure from private domestic wells in the conterminous United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 55 (3), 1822–1831. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05835
  37. New-Aaron, M., O. Abimbola, R. Mohammadi, O. Famojuro, Z. Naveed, A. Abadi, J.E. Bell, S. Bartelt-Hunt, and E.G. Rogan, 2021: Low-level groundwater atrazine in high atrazine usage Nebraska counties: Likely effects of excessive groundwater abstraction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (24). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413241
  38. Sugg, M., J. Runkle, R. Leeper, H. Bagli, A. Golden, L.H. Handwerger, T. Magee, C. Moreno, R. Reed-Kelly, M. Taylor, and S. Woolard, 2020: A scoping review of drought impacts on health and society in North America. Climatic Change, 162 (3), 1177–1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02848-6
  39. Berman, J.D., M.R. Ramirez, J.E. Bell, R. Bilotta, F. Gerr, and N.B. Fethke, 2021: The association between drought conditions and increased occupational psychosocial stress among U.S. farmers: An occupational cohort study. Science of The Total Environment, 798, 149245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149245
  40. Burke, M., A. Driscoll, S. Heft-Neal, J. Xue, J. Burney, and M. Wara, 2021: The changing risk and burden of wildfire in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118 (2), e2011048118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011048118
  41. Isaac, F., S.R. Toukhsati, M. Di Benedetto, and G.A. Kennedy, 2021: A systematic review of the impact of wildfires on sleep disturbances. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (19), 10152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910152
  42. Silveira, S., M. Kornbluh, M.C. Withers, G. Grennan, V. Ramanathan, and J. Mishra, 2021: Chronic mental health sequelae of climate change extremes: A case study of the deadliest Californian wildfire. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (4), 1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041487
  43. Stokes, S.C., K.S. Romanowski, S. Sen, D.G. Greenhalgh, and T.L. Palmieri, 2021: Wildfire burn patients: A unique population. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 42 (5), 905–910. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irab107
  44. To, P., E. Eboreime, and V.I.O. Agyapong, 2021: The impact of wildfires on mental health: A scoping review. Behavioral Sciences, 11 (9), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11090126
  45. Gan, R.W., J. Liu, B. Ford, K. O’Dell, A. Vaidyanathan, A. Wilson, J. Volckens, G. Pfister, E.V. Fischer, J.R. Pierce, and S. Magzamen, 2020: The association between wildfire smoke exposure and asthma-specific medical care utilization in Oregon during the 2013 wildfire season. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 30 (4), 618–628. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0210-x
  46. Grant, E. and J.D. Runkle, 2022: Long-term health effects of wildfire exposure: A scoping review. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 6, 100110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100110
  47. Kondo, M.C., A.J. De Roos, L.S. White, W.E. Heilman, M.H. Mockrin, C.A. Gross-Davis, and I. Burstyn, 2019: Meta-analysis of heterogeneity in the effects of wildfire smoke exposure on respiratory health in North America. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (6), 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16060960
  48. Reid, C.E., M. Brauer, F.H. Johnston, M. Jerrett, J.R. Balmes, and C.T. Elliott, 2016: Critical review of health impacts of wildfire smoke exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124 (9), 1334–1343. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409277
  49. Wettstein, Z.S., S. Hoshiko, J. Fahimi, R.J. Harrison, W.E. Cascio, and A.G. Rappold, 2018: Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular emergency department visits associated with wildfire smoke exposure in California in 2015. Journal of the American Heart Association, 7 (8), e007492. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.117.007492
  50. Anyamba, A., J.-P. Chretien, S.C. Britch, R.P. Soebiyanto, J.L. Small, R. Jepsen, B.M. Forshey, J.L. Sanchez, R.D. Smith, R. Harris, C.J. Tucker, W.B. Karesh, and K.J. Linthicum, 2019: Global disease outbreaks associated with the 2015–2016 El Niño event. Scientific Reports, 9 (1), 1930. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38034-z
  51. Benedict, K. and B.J. Park, 2014: Invasive fungal infections after natural disasters. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 20 (3), 349–355. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2003.131230
  52. Beyer, R.M., A. Manica, and C. Mora, 2021: Shifts in global bat diversity suggest a possible role of climate change in the emergence of SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2. Science of The Total Environment, 767, 145413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145413
  53. Carlson, C.J., G.F. Albery, C. Merow, C.H. Trisos, C.M. Zipfel, E.A. Eskew, K.J. Olival, N. Ross, and S. Bansal, 2022: Climate change increases cross-species viral transmission risk. Nature, 607 (7919), 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04788-w
  54. Escobar, L.E., A. Velasco-Villa, P.S. Satheshkumar, Y. Nakazawa, and P. Van de Vuurst, 2023: Revealing the complexity of vampire bat rabies “spillover transmission”. Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 12 (1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-023-01062-7
  55. Hayes, M.A. and A.J. Piaggio, 2018: Assessing the potential impacts of a changing climate on the distribution of a rabies virus vector. PLoS ONE, 13 (2), e0192887. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192887
  56. Hueffer, K., A.J. Parkinson, R. Gerlach, and J. Berner, 2013: Zoonotic infections in Alaska: Disease prevalence, potential impact of climate change and recommended actions for earlier disease detection, research, prevention and control. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 72 (1). https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v72i0.19562
  57. Gharpure, R., M. Gleason, Z. Salah, A.J. Blackstock, D. Hess-Homeier, J.S. Yoder, I.K.M. Ali, S.A. Collier, and J.R. Cope, 2021: Geographic range of recreational water–associated primary amebic meningoencephalitis, United States, 1978–2018. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 27 (1), 271–274. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2701.202119
  58. Hepler, S.A., K.A. Kaufeld, K. Benedict, M. Toda, B.R. Jackson, X. Liu, and D. Kline, 2022: Integrating public health surveillance and environmental data to model presence of Histoplasma in the United States. Epidemiology, 33 (5). https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000001499
  59. Jackson, M.K., C. Pelletier Keith, J. Scheftel, D. Kerkaert Joshua, L. Robinson Serina, T. McDonald, B. Bender Jeff, F. Knight Joseph, M. Ireland, and K. Nielsen, 2021: Blastomyces dermatitidis environmental prevalence in Minnesota: Analysis and modeling using soil collected at basal and outbreak sites. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 87 (5), e01922–20. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01922-20
  60. Uejio, C.K., S. Mak, A. Manangan, G. Luber, and K.H. Bartlett, 2015: Climatic influences on Cryptococcus gattii populations, Vancouver Island, Canada, 2002–2004. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 21 (11), 1989–96. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2111.141161
  61. Gorris, M.E., J.E. Neumann, P.L. Kinney, M. Sheahan, and M.C. Sarofim, 2021: Economic valuation of coccidioidomycosis (Valley fever) projections in the United States in response to climate change. Weather, Climate, and Society, 13 (1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-20-0036.1
  62. de Perio, M.A., B.L. Materna, G.L. Sondermeyer Cooksey, D.J. Vugia, C.P. Su, S.E. Luckhaupt, J. McNary, and J.A. Wilken, 2019: Occupational coccidioidomycosis surveillance and recent outbreaks in California. Medical Mycology, 57 (Supplement_1), S41–S45. https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myy031
  63. Gorris, M.E., K.K. Treseder, C.S. Zender, and J.T. Randerson, 2019: Expansion of coccidioidomycosis endemic regions in the United States in response to climate change. GeoHealth, 3 (10), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gh000209
  64. McCurdy, S.A., C. Portillo-Silva, C.L. Sipan, H. Bang, and K.W. Emery, 2020: Risk for coccidioidomycosis among Hispanic farm workers, California, USA, 2018. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 26 (7), 1430–1437. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2607.200024
  65. Benedict, K., O.Z. McCotter, S. Brady, K. Komatsu, G.L. Sondermeyer Cooksey, A. Nguyen, S. Jain, D.J. Vugia, and B.R. Jackson, 2019: Surveillance for coccidioidomycosis—United States, 2011–2017. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 68 (7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6807a1
  66. California Department of Public Health, 2019: Epidemiologic Summary of Valley Fever (Coccidioidomycosis) in California, 2019. California Department of Public Health, Center for Infectious Diseases, Sacramento, CA. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/cid/dcdc/cdph%20document%20library/cocciepisummary2019.pdf
  67. Carey, A., M. Gorris, T. Chiller, B. Jackson, W. Beadles, and B. Webb, 2021: Epidemiology, clinical features, and outcomes of coccidioidomycosis, Utah, 2006–2015. Emerging Infectious Disease, 27 (9), 2269. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2709.210751
  68. Sondermeyer Cooksey, G.L., A. Nguyen, D. Vugia, and S. Jain, 2020: Regional analysis of coccidioidomycosis incidence—California, 2000–2018. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69, 1817–1821. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6948a4
  69. NCEH, 2023: Climate Effects on Health. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health. https://www.cdc.gov/climateandhealth/effects/default.htm
  70. OPHDST, 2023: National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System: Notifiable Infectious Disease Tables. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Public Health Data, Surveillance, and Technology. https://www.cdc.gov/nndss/data-statistics/infectious-tables/index.html
  71. Beard, C.B., S.N. Visser, and L.R. Petersen, 2019: The need for a national strategy to address vector-borne disease threats in the United States. Journal of Medical Entomology, 56 (5), 1199–1203. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjz074
  72. Bisanzio, D., M.P. Fernández, E. Martello, R. Reithinger, and M.A. Diuk-Wasser, 2020: Current and future spatiotemporal patterns of Lyme disease reporting in the northeastern United States. JAMA Network Open, 3 (3), e200319. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0319
  73. Kugeler, K.J., A.M. Schwartz, M.J. Delorey, P.S. Mead, and A.F. Hinckley, 2021: Estimating the frequency of Lyme disease diagnoses, United States, 2010–2018. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 27 (2), 616–619. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2702.202731
  74. Caminade, C., K.M. McIntyre, and A.E. Jones, 2019: Impact of recent and future climate change on vector-borne diseases. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1436 (1), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13950
  75. Gilbert, L., 2021: The impacts of climate change on ticks and tick-borne disease risk. Annual Review of Entomology, 66 (1), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-052720-094533
  76. Ogden, N.H., C. Ben Beard, H.S. Ginsberg, and J.I. Tsao, 2021: Possible effects of climate change on ixodid ticks and the pathogens they transmit: Predictions and observations. Journal of Medical Entomology, 58 (4), 1536–1545. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjaa220
  77. Porter, W.T., Z.A. Barrand, J. Wachara, K. DaVall, J.R. Mihaljevic, T. Pearson, D.J. Salkeld, and N.C. Nieto, 2021: Predicting the current and future distribution of the western black-legged tick, Ixodes pacificus, across the western US using citizen science collections. PLoS ONE, 16 (1), e0244754. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244754
  78. Sonenshine, D.E., 2018: Range expansion of tick disease vectors in North America: Implications for spread of tick-borne disease. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15 (3), 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030478
  79. Soucy, J.-P.R., A.M. Slatculescu, C. Nyiraneza, N.H. Ogden, P.A. Leighton, J.T. Kerr, and M.A. Kulkarni, 2018: High-resolution ecological niche modeling of Ixodes scapularis ticks based on passive surveillance data at the northern frontier of Lyme disease emergence in North America. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 18 (5), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2017.2234
  80. Lippi, C.A., H.D. Gaff, A.L. White, and S.J. Ryan, 2021: Scoping review of distribution models for selected Amblyomma ticks and rickettsial group pathogens. PeerJ, 9, e10596. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10596
  81. Ma, D., X. Lun, C. Li, R. Zhou, Z. Zhao, J. Wang, Q. Zhang, and Q. Liu, 2021: Predicting the potential global distribution of Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) under near current and future climatic conditions, using the maximum entropy model. Biology, 10 (10), 1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10101057
  82. Molaei, G., E.A.H. Little, S.C. Williams, and K.C. Stafford, 2019: Bracing for the worst—Range expansion of the Lone Star tick in the northeastern United States. The New England Journal of Medicine, 381 (23), 2189–2192. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1911661
  83. Raghavan, R.K., A.T. Peterson, M.E. Cobos, R. Ganta, and D. Foley, 2019: Current and future distribution of the lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum (L.) (Acari: Ixodidae) in North America. PLoS ONE, 14 (1), e0209082. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209082
  84. Sagurova, I., A. Ludwig, N.H. Ogden, Y. Pelcat, G. Dueymes, and P. Gachon, 2019: Predicted northward expansion of the geographic range of the tick vector Amblyomma americanum in North America under future climate conditions. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127 (10), 107014. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp5668
  85. Molaei, G., E.A.H. Little, N. Khalil, B.N. Ayres, W.L. Nicholson, and C.D. Paddock, 2021: Established population of the Gulf Coast tick, Amblyomma maculatum (Acari: Ixodidae), infected with Rickettsia parkeri (Rickettsiales: Rickettsiaceae), in Connecticut. Journal of Medical Entomology, 58 (3), 1459–1462. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjaa299
  86. MacDonald, A.J., 2018: Abiotic and habitat drivers of tick vector abundance, diversity, phenology and human encounter risk in southern California. PLoS ONE, 13 (7), e0201665. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201665
  87. MacDonald, A.J., S. McComb, C. O’Neill, K.A. Padgett, and A.E. Larsen, 2020: Projected climate and land use change alter western blacklegged tick phenology, seasonal host-seeking suitability and human encounter risk in California. Global Change Biology, 26 (10), 5459–5474. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15269
  88. MacDonald, A.J., C. O’Neill, M.H. Yoshimizu, K.A. Padgett, and A.E. Larsen, 2019: Tracking seasonal activity of the western blacklegged tick across California. Journal of Applied Ecology, 56 (11), 2562–2573. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13490
  89. McClure, M. and M.A. Diuk-Wasser, 2019: Climate impacts on blacklegged tick host-seeking behavior. International journal for parasitology, 49 (1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.08.005
  90. Chowell, G., K. Mizumoto, J.M. Banda, S. Poccia, and C. Perrings, 2019: Assessing the potential impact of vector-borne disease transmission following heavy rainfall events: A mathematical framework. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 374 (1775), 20180272. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0272
  91. Coalson, J.E., E.J. Anderson, E.M. Santos, V.M. Garcia, J.K. Romine, J.K. Luzingu, B. Dominguez, D.M. Richard, A.C. Little, M.H. Hayden, and K.C. Ernst, 2021: The complex epidemiological relationship between flooding events and human outbreaks of mosquito-borne diseases: A scoping review. Environmental Health Perspectives, 129 (9), 096002. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp8887
  92. Monaghan, A.J., C.A. Schmidt, M.H. Hayden, K.A. Smith, M.H. Reiskind, R. Cabell, and K.C. Ernst, 2019: A simple model to predict the potential abundance of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes one month in advance. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 100 (2), 434–437. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.17-0860
  93. Blagrove, M.S.C., C. Caminade, P.J. Diggle, E.I. Patterson, K. Sherlock, G.E. Chapman, J. Hesson, S. Metelmann, P.J. McCall, G. Lycett, J. Medlock, G.L. Hughes, A. della Torre, and M. Baylis, 2020: Potential for Zika virus transmission by mosquitoes in temperate climates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287 (1930), 20200119. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.0119
  94. Filho, W.L., S. Scheday, J. Boenecke, A. Gogoi, A. Maharaj, and S. Korovou, 2019: Climate change, health and mosquito-borne diseases: Trends and implications to the Pacific region. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (24), 5114. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245114
  95. Khan, S.U., N.H. Ogden, A.A. Fazil, P.H. Gachon, G.U. Dueymes, A.L. Greer, and V. Ng, 2020: Current and projected distributions of Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus in Canada and the U.S. Environmental Health Perspectives, 128 (5), 057007. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp5899
  96. Kraemer, M.U.G., R.C. Reiner Jr., O.J. Brady, J.P. Messina, M. Gilbert, D.M. Pigott, D. Yi, K. Johnson, L. Earl, L.B. Marczak, S. Shirude, N. Davis Weaver, D. Bisanzio, T.A. Perkins, S. Lai, X. Lu, P. Jones, G.E. Coelho, R.G. Carvalho, W. Van Bortel, C. Marsboom, G. Hendrickx, F. Schaffner, C.G. Moore, H.H. Nax, L. Bengtsson, E. Wetter, A.J. Tatem, J.S. Brownstein, D.L. Smith, L. Lambrechts, S. Cauchemez, C. Linard, N.R. Faria, O.G. Pybus, T.W. Scott, Q. Liu, H. Yu, G.R.W. Wint, S.I. Hay, and N. Golding, 2019: Past and future spread of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Nature Microbiology, 4 (5), 854–863. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0376-y
  97. Matysiak, A. and A. Roess, 2017: Interrelationship between climatic, ecologic, social, and cultural determinants affecting dengue emergence and transmission in Puerto Rico and their implications for Zika response. Journal of Tropical Medicine, 2017, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8947067
  98. Messina, J.P., O.J. Brady, N. Golding, M.U.G. Kraemer, G.R.W. Wint, S.E. Ray, D.M. Pigott, F.M. Shearer, K. Johnson, L. Earl, L.B. Marczak, S. Shirude, N. Davis Weaver, M. Gilbert, R. Velayudhan, P. Jones, T. Jaenisch, T.W. Scott, R.C. Reiner, and S.I. Hay, 2019: The current and future global distribution and population at risk of dengue. Nature Microbiology, 4 (9), 1508–1515. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0476-8
  99. NCEH, 2022: Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Climate Adaptation Planning. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health. https://www.cdc.gov/climateandhealth/jedi.htm
  100. Gorris, M.E., A.W. Bartlow, S.D. Temple, D. Romero-Alvarez, D.P. Shutt, J.M. Fair, K.A. Kaufeld, S.Y. Del Valle, and C.A. Manore, 2021: Updated distribution maps of predominant Culex mosquitoes across the Americas. Parasites & Vectors, 14 (1), 547. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-05051-3
  101. Keyel, A.C., A. Raghavendra, A.T. Ciota, and O. Elison Timm, 2021: West Nile virus is predicted to be more geographically widespread in New York State and Connecticut under future climate change. Global Change Biology, 27 (21), 5430–5445. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15842
  102. Shocket, M.S., A.B. Verwillow, M.G. Numazu, H. Slamani, J.M. Cohen, F. El Moustaid, J. Rohr, L.R. Johnson, and E.A. Mordecai, 2020: Transmission of West Nile and five other temperate mosquito-borne viruses peaks at temperatures between 23°C and 26°C. eLife, 9, e58511. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.58511
  103. Corrin, T., R. Ackford, M. Mascarenhas, J. Greig, and L.A. Waddell, 2020: Eastern equine encephalitis virus: A scoping review of the global evidence. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 21 (5), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2020.2671
  104. Diaz, A., L.L. Coffey, N. Burkett-Cadena, and J.F. Day, 2018: Reemergence of St. Louis encephalitis virus in the Americas. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 24 (12), 2150–2157. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2412.180372
  105. Faizah, A.N., D. Kobayashi, M. Amoa-Bosompem, Y. Higa, Y. Tsuda, K. Itokawa, K. Miura, K. Hirayama, K. Sawabe, and H. Isawa, 2021: Evaluating the competence of the primary vector, Culex tritaeniorhynchus, and the invasive mosquito species, Aedes japonicus japonicus, in transmitting three Japanese encephalitis virus genotypes. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 14 (12), e0008986. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008986
  106. Harding, S., J. Greig, M. Mascarenhas, I. Young, and L.A. Waddell, 2019: La Crosse virus: A scoping review of the global evidence. Epidemiology & Infection, 147, e66. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268818003096
  107. Little, E.A.H., M.L. Hutchinson, K.J. Price, A. Marini, J.J. Shepard, and G. Molaei, 2022: Spatiotemporal distribution, abundance, and host interactions of two invasive vectors of arboviruses, Aedes albopictus and Aedes japonicus, in Pennsylvania, USA. Parasites & Vectors, 15 (1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05151-8
  108. McKenzie, B.A., K. Stevens, A.E. McKenzie, J. Bozic, D. Mathias, and S. Zohdy, 2019: Aedes vector surveillance in the southeastern United States reveals growing threat of Aedes japonicus japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae) and Aedes albopictus. Journal of Medical Entomology, 56 (6), 1745–1749. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjz115
  109. Mogi, M., P.A. Armbruster, and N. Tuno, 2020: Differences in responses to urbanization between invasive mosquitoes, Aedes japonicus japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae) and Aedes albopictus, in their native range, Japan. Journal of Medical Entomology, 57 (1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjz145
  110. Reed, E.M.X., B.D. Byrd, S.L. Richards, M. Eckardt, C. Williams, and M.H. Reiskind, 2019: A statewide survey of container Aedes mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in North Carolina, 2016: A multiagency surveillance response to Zika using ovitraps. Journal of Medical Entomology, 56 (2), 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjy190
  111. Rowe, R.D., A. Odoi, D. Paulsen, A.C. Moncayo, and R.T. Trout Fryxell, 2020: Spatial-temporal clusters of host-seeking Aedes albopictus, Aedes japonicus, and Aedes triseriatus collections in a La Crosse virus endemic county (Knox County, Tennessee, USA). PLoS ONE, 15 (9), e0237322. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237322
  112. Raymond, W.W., J.S. Barber, M.N. Dethier, H.A. Hayford, C.D.G. Harley, T.L. King, B. Paul, C.A. Speck, E.D. Tobin, A.E.T. Raymond, and P.S. McDonald, 2022: Assessment of the impacts of an unprecedented heatwave on intertidal shellfish of the Salish Sea. Ecology, 103 (10), e3798. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3798
  113. Sheahan, M., C.A. Gould, J.E. Neumann, P.L. Kinney, S. Hoffmann, C. Fant, X. Wang, and M. Kolian, 2022: Examining the relationship between climate change and vibriosis in the United States: Projected health and economic impacts for the 21st century. Environmental Health Perspectives, 130 (8), 087007. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp9999a
  114. Baker-Austin, C., J.D. Oliver, M. Alam, A. Ali, M.K. Waldor, F. Qadri, and J. Martinez-Urtaza, 2018: Vibrio spp. infections. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 4 (1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-018-0005-8
  115. Brumfield, K.D., M. Usmani, K.M. Chen, M. Gangwar, A.S. Jutla, A. Huq, and R.R. Colwell, 2021: Environmental parameters associated with incidence and transmission of pathogenic Vibrio spp. Environmental Microbiology, 23 (12), 7314–7340. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15716
  116. Deeb, R., D. Tufford, G.I. Scott, J.G. Moore, and K. Dow, 2018: Impact of climate change on Vibrio vulnificus abundance and exposure risk. Estuaries and Coasts, 41 (8), 2289–2303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-018-0424-5
  117. Froelich, B.A. and D.A. Daines, 2020: In hot water: Effects of climate change on Vibrio–human interactions. Environmental Microbiology, 22 (10), 4101–4111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14967
  118. Shultz, J.M., A. Rechkemmer, A. Rai, and K.T. McManus, 2019: Public health and mental health implications of environmentally induced forced migration. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 13 (2), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2018.27
  119. Garnett, M.F., S.C. Curtin, and D.M. Stone, 2022: Suicide Mortality in the United States, 2000–2020. NCHS Data Brief No. 433. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc:114217
  120. SAMHSA, 2021: Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results from the 2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. HHS Publication No. PEP21-07-01-003, NSDUH Series H-56. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Rockville, MD. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/reports/rpt35325/NSDUHFFRPDFWHTMLFiles2020/2020NSDUHFFR1PDFW102121.pdf
  121. Bevilacqua, K., R. Rasul, S. Schneider, M. Guzman, V. Nepal, D. Banerjee, J. Schulte, and R.M. Schwartz, 2020: Understanding associations between Hurricane Harvey exposure and mental health symptoms among greater Houston-area residents. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 14 (1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2019.141
  122. Neria, Y. and J.M. Shultz, 2012: Mental health effects of Hurricane Sandy: Characteristics, potential aftermath, and response. JAMA, 308 (24), 2571–2572. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.110700
  123. Raker, E.J., S.R. Lowe, M.C. Arcaya, S.T. Johnson, J. Rhodes, and M.C. Waters, 2019: Twelve years later: The long-term mental health consequences of Hurricane Katrina. Social Science & Medicine, 242, 112610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112610
  124. Torres-Mendoza, Y., A. Kerr, A.H. Schnall, C. Blackmore, and S.D. Hartley, 2021: Community assessment for mental and physical health effects after Hurricane Irma—Florida Keys, May 2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 70 (26), 937–941. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7026a1
  125. Burke, M., F. González, P. Baylis, S. Heft-Neal, C. Baysan, S. Basu, and S. Hsiang, 2018: Higher temperatures increase suicide rates in the United States and Mexico. Nature Climate Change, 8 (8), 723–729. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0222-x
  126. Reo, N.J. and L.A. Ogden, 2018: Anishnaabe Aki: An indigenous perspective on the global threat of invasive species. Sustainability Science, 13, 1443–1452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0571-4
  127. Tribal Adaptation Menu Team, 2019: Dibaginjigaadeg Anishinaabe Ezhitwaad: A Tribal Climate Adaptation Menu. Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission, Odanah, WI, 54 pp. https://forestadaptation.org/tribal-climate-adaptation-menu
  128. Middleton, J., A. Cunsolo, A. Jones-Bitton, C.J. Wright, and S.L. Harper, 2020: Indigenous mental health in a changing climate: A systematic scoping review of the global literature. Environmental Research Letters, 15 (5), 053001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab68a9
  129. STACCWG, 2021: The Status of Tribes and Climate Change Report. Marks-Marino, D., Ed. Northern Arizona University, Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals, Flagstaff, AZ. http://nau.edu/stacc2021
  130. Thiery, W., S. Lange, J. Rogelj, C.-F. Schleussner, L. Gudmundsson, S.I. Seneviratne, M. Andrijevic, K. Frieler, K. Emanuel, T. Geiger, D.N. Bresch, F. Zhao, S.N. Willner, M. Büchner, J. Volkholz, N. Bauer, J. Chang, P. Ciais, M. Dury, L. François, M. Grillakis, S.N. Gosling, N. Hanasaki, T. Hickler, V. Huber, A. Ito, J. Jägermeyr, N. Khabarov, A. Koutroulis, W. Liu, W. Lutz, M. Mengel, C. Müller, S. Ostberg, C.P.O. Reyer, T. Stacke, and Y. Wada, 2021: Intergenerational inequities in exposure to climate extremes. Science, 374 (6564), 158–160. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi7339
  131. Hughes, K., M.A. Bellis, K.A. Hardcastle, D. Sethi, A. Butchart, C. Mikton, L. Jones, and M.P. Dunne, 2017: The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 2 (8), e356–e366. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(17)30118-4
  132. Hickman, C., E. Marks, P. Pihkala, S. Clayton, R.E. Lewandowski, E.E. Mayall, B. Wray, C. Mellor, and L. van Susteren, 2021: Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: A global survey. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5 (12), e863–e873. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00278-3
  133. Coffey, Y., N. Bhullar, J. Durkin, M.S. Islam, and K. Usher, 2021: Understanding eco-anxiety: A systematic scoping review of current literature and identified knowledge gaps. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 3, 100047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100047
  134. Joyce, S., F. Shand, J. Tighe, S.J. Laurent, R.A. Bryant, and S.B. Harvey, 2018: Road to resilience: A systematic review and meta-analysis of resilience training programmes and interventions. BMJ Open, 8 (6), e017858. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017858
  135. Rousell, D. and A. Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, 2020: A systematic review of climate change education: Giving children and young people a ‘voice’ and a ‘hand’ in redressing climate change. Children's Geographies, 18 (2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2019.1614532
  136. Sanson, A. and M. Bellemo, 2021: Children and youth in the climate crisis. BJPsych Bulletin, 45 (4), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2021.16
  137. Semenza, J.C., J. Rocklöv, and K.L. Ebi, 2022: Climate change and cascading risks from infectious disease. Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 11 (4), 1371–1390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00647-3
  138. Sheridan, S.C., W. Zhang, X. Deng, and S. Lin, 2021: The individual and synergistic impacts of windstorms and power outages on injury ED visits in New York State. Science of The Total Environment, 797, 149199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149199
  139. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 2021: Heat injury and illness prevention in outdoor and indoor work settings. Federal Register, 86 (205), 59309–59326. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-10-27/pdf/2021-23250.pdf
  140. Park, R.J., N. Pankratz, and A.P. Behrer, 2021: Temperature, Workplace Safety, and Labor Market Inequality. IZA DP No. 14560. IZA Institute of Labor Economics. https://docs.iza.org/dp14560.pdf
  141. Spector, J.T., Y.J. Masuda, N.H. Wolff, M. Calkins, and N. Seixas, 2019: Heat exposure and occupational injuries: Review of the literature and implications. Current Environmental Health Reports, 6 (4), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-019-00250-8
  142. Nerbass, F.B., R. Pecoits-Filho, W.F. Clark, J.M. Sontrop, C.W. McIntyre, and L. Moist, 2017: Occupational heat stress and kidney health: From farms to factories. Kidney International Reports, 2 (6), 998–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2017.08.012
  143. EPA, 2021: Climate Change and Social Vulnerability in the United States: A Focus on Six Impacts. EPA 430-R-21-003. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/cira/social-vulnerability-report
  144. Licker, R., K. Dahl, and J.T. Abatzoglou, 2022: Quantifying the impact of future extreme heat on the outdoor work sector in the United States. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 10 (1), 00048. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00048
  145. Neidell, M., J.G. Zivin, M. Sheahan, J. Willwerth, C. Fant, M. Sarofim, and J. Martinich, 2021: Temperature and work: Time allocated to work under varying climate and labor market conditions. PLoS ONE, 16 (8), 0254224. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254224
  146. Schulte, P.A., A. Bhattacharya, C.R. Butler, H.K. Chun, B. Jacklitsch, T. Jacobs, M. Kiefer, J. Lincoln, S. Pendergrass, J. Shire, J. Watson, and G.R. Wagner, 2016: Advancing the framework for considering the effects of climate change on worker safety and health. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 13 (11), 847–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2016.1179388
  147. Clayton, S., C. Manning, M. Speiser, and A.N. Hill, 2021: Mental Health and Our Changing Climate: Impacts, Inequities, Responses. American Psychological Association and ecoAmerica, Washington, DC. https://ecoamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/mental-health-climate-change-2021-ea-apa.pdf
  148. Lancet Countdown, 2020: Compounding Crises of Our Time During Hurricane Laura. 2020 Case Study 1. Lancet Countdown. https://www.lancetcountdownus.org/2020-case-study-1/
  149. WHO, 2021: WHO’s 10 Calls for Climate Action to Assure Sustained Recovery From COVID-19: Global Health Workforce Urges Action to Avert Health Catastrophe. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news/item/11-10-2021-who-s-10-calls-for-climate-action-to-assure-sustained-recovery-from-covid-19
  150. Lancet Countdown, 2021: 2021 Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change: Policy Brief for the United States of America. Salas, R.N., P.K. Lester, and J.J. Hess, Eds. Lancet Countdown, London, UK. https://www.lancetcountdownus.org/2021-lancet-countdown-us-brief/
  151. CSB, 2018: Organic Peroxide Decomposition, Release, and Fire at Arkema Crosby Following Hurricane Harvey Flooding. Report No. 2017-08-I-TX. U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, Crosby, TX. https://www.csb.gov/file.aspx?documentid=6068
  152. CSD and TEJAS, 2016: Double Jeopardy in Houston: Acute and Chronic Chemical Exposures Pose Disproportionate Risks for Marginalized Communities. Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists and Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy Services, 26 pp. https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2016/10/ucs-double-jeopardy-in-houston-full-report-2016.pdf
  153. Elliott, M.R., Y. Wang, R.A. Lowe, and P.R. Kleindorfer, 2004: Environmental justice: Frequency and severity of US chemical industry accidents and the socioeconomic status of surrounding communities. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58 (1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.58.1.24
  154. EPA, 2016: Regulatory Impact Analysis: Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act, Section 112(r)(7). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency Management, Washington, DC. https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OEM-2015-0725-0734
  155. Fleischman, L. and M. Franklin, 2017: Fumes Across the Fence-Line: The Health Impacts of Air Pollution from Oil & Gas Facilities on African American Communities. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and Clean Air Task Force. https://naacp.org/resources/fumes-across-fence-line-health-impacts-air-pollution-oil-gas-facilities-african-american
  156. Flores, D., C. Kalman, M. Mabson, and D. Minovi, 2021: Preventing “Double Disasters”. Center for Progressive Reform, Earthjustice, and Union of Concerned Scientists. https://cpr-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/preventing-double-disasters-final.pdf
  157. Flores, D., D. Minovi, and J. Clark, 2021: Tanks for Nothing: The Decades-Long Failure to Protect the Public from Hazardous Chemical Spills. Center for Progressive Reform. http://progressivereform.org/our-work/energy-environment/tanks-for-nothing-ast-rpt/
  158. Frank, A. and S. Moulton, 2014: Kids in Danger Zones: One in Three U.S. Schoolchildren at Risk from Chemical Catastrophes. Center for Effective Government. https://search.issuelab.org/resource/kids-in-danger-zones-one-in-three-u-s-schoolchildren-at-risk-from-chemical-catastrophes.html
  159. Orum, P., R. Moore, M. Roberts, and J. Sanchez, 2014: Who's in Danger? Race, Poverty, and Chemical Disasters: A Demographic Analysis of Chemical Disasters Vulnerability Zones. Environmental Justice and Health Alliance for Chemical Policy Reform. https://comingcleaninc.org/assets/media/images/Reports/Who's%20in%20Danger%20Report%20FINAL.pdf
  160. Starbuck, A. and R. White, 2016: Living in the Shadow of Danger: Poverty, Race, and Unequal Chemicals Facility Hazards. Center for Effective Government. https://www.foreffectivegov.org/shadow-of-danger
  161. White, R., 2018: Life at the Fenceline: Understanding Cumulative Health Hazards in Environmental Justice Communities. Coming Clean, The Environmental Justice Health Alliance for Chemical Policy Reform, and the Campaign for Healthier Solutions. https://ej4all.org/life-at-the-fenceline
  162. Wilson, A., J. Patterson, K. Wasserman, A. Starbuck, A. Sartor, J. Hatcher, J. Fleming, and K. Fink, 2012: Coal Blooded: Putting Profits Before People. Morris, M.W., Ed. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Indigenous Environmental Network, and Little Village Environmental Justice Organization, 128 pp. https://naacp.org/resources/coal-blooded-putting-profits-people
  163. Asian Pacific Environmental Network, Central Coast Alliance for a Sustainable Economy, Physicians for Social Responsibility - Los Angeles, Public Health Institute, WE ACT for Environmental Justice, UC Berkeley Sustainability and Health Equity Lab, UC Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, and Climate Central, 2020: Toxic Tides Project. University of California, Berkeley. https://sites.google.com/berkeley.edu/toxictides/home
  164. Coffey, E., K. Waltz, D. Chizewer, E.A. Benfer, M.N. Templeton, and R. Weinstock, 2020: Poisonous Homes: The Fight for Environmental Justice in Federally Assisted Housing. Shriver Center on Poverty Law. https://www.povertylaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/environmental_justice_report_final-rev2.pdf
  165. Doeffinger, T. and J.W. Hall, 2021: Assessing water security across scales: A case study of the United States. Applied Geography, 134, 102500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102500
  166. Seligman, H.K. and S.A. Berkowitz, 2019: Aligning programs and policies to support food security and public health goals in the United States. Annual Review of Public Health, 40 (1), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044132
  167. Greer, R.A., 2020: A review of public water infrastructure financing in the United States. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 7 (5), e1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1472
  168. Jones, L. and C. Ingram Jani, 2022: Invited perspective: Tribal water issues exemplified by the Navajo Nation. Environmental Health Perspectives, 130 (12), 121301. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12187
  169. Baum, A., M.L. Barnett, J. Wisnivesky, and M.D. Schwartz, 2019: Association between a temporary reduction in access to health care and long-term changes in hypertension control among veterans after a natural disaster. JAMA Network Open, 2 (11), e1915111. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15111
  170. Rudowitz, R., D. Rowland, and A. Shartzer, 2006: Health care in New Orleans before and after Hurricane Katrina. Health Affairs, 25 (Supplement 1), W393–W406. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.25.w393
  171. Nogueira, L.M., L. Sahar, J.A. Efstathiou, A. Jemal, and K.R. Yabroff, 2019: Association between declared hurricane disasters and survival of patients with lung cancer undergoing radiation treatment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 322 (3), 269. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.7657
  172. Lurie, N., K. Finne, C. Worrall, M. Jauregui, T. Thaweethai, G. Margolis, and J. Kelman, 2015: Early dialysis and adverse outcomes after Hurricane Sandy. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 66 (3), 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.04.050
  173. Fant, C., J.M. Jacobs, P. Chinowsky, W. Sweet, N. Weiss, J.E. Sias, J. Martinich, and J.E. Neumann, 2021: Mere nuisance or growing threat? The physical and economic impact of high tide flooding on US road networks. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 27 (4), 04021044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000652
  174. Donatuto, J., L. Campbell, C. Cooley, M. Cruz, J. Doyle, M. Eggers, T. Farrow Ferman, S. Gaughen, P. Hardison, C. Jones, D. Marks-Marino, A. Pairis, W. Red Elk, D. Sambo Dorough, and C. Sanders, 2021: Ch. 5. Health & wellbeing. In: Status of Tribes and Climate Change Report. Marks-Marino, D., Ed. Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals, 159–173. http://nau.edu/stacc2021
  175. Schramm, P.J., A.L.A. Janabi, L.W. Campbell, J.L. Donatuto, and S.C. Gaughen, 2020: How Indigenous communities are adapting to climate change: Insights from the Climate-Ready Tribes Initiative. Health Affairs, 39 (12), 2153–2159. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00997
  176. Ford, J.D., N. King, E.K. Galappaththi, T. Pearce, G. McDowell, and S.L. Harper, 2020: The resilience of Indigenous peoples to environmental change. One Earth, 2 (6), 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.05.014
  177. Tiatia-Seath, J., T. Tupou, and I. Fookes, 2020: Climate change, mental health, and well-being for Pacific peoples: A literature review. The Contemporary Pacific, 32 (2), 399–430. https://doi.org/10.1353/cp.2020.0035
  178. Stein, P.J.S. and M.A. Stein, 2022: Climate change and the right to health of people with disabilities. The Lancet Global Health, 10 (1), e24–e25. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00542-8
  179. Engelman, A., L. Craig, and A. Iles, 2022: Global disability justice in climate disasters: Mobilizing people with disabilities as change agents. Health Affairs, 41 (10), 1496–1504. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00474
  180. Elser, H., R.M. Parks, N. Moghavem, M.V. Kiang, N. Bozinov, V.W. Henderson, D.H. Rehkopf, and J.A. Casey, 2021: Anomalously warm weather and acute care visits in patients with multiple sclerosis: A retrospective study of privately insured individuals in the US. PLoS Medicine, 18 (4), e1003580. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003580
  181. Chakraborty, J., 2022: Disparities in exposure to fine particulate air pollution for people with disabilities in the US. Science of The Total Environment, 842, 156791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156791
  182. Tessum, C.W., D.A. Paolella, S.E. Chambliss, J.S. Apte, J.D. Hill, and J.D. Marshall, 2021: PM2.5 polluters disproportionately and systemically affect people of color in the United States. Science Advances, 7 (18), 4491. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf4491
  183. Wu, X., R.C. Nethery, M.B. Sabath, D. Braun, and F. Dominici, 2020: Air pollution and COVID-19 mortality in the United States: Strengths and limitations of an ecological regression analysis. Science Advances, 6 (45), 4049. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd4049
  184. Hoffman, J.S., V. Shandas, and N. Pendleton, 2020: The effects of historical housing policies on resident exposure to intra-urban heat: A study of 108 US urban areas. Climate, 8 (1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli8010012
  185. Lane, H.M., R. Morello-Frosch, J.D. Marshall, and J.S. Apte, 2022: Historical redlining is associated with present-day air pollution disparities in U.S. cities. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 9 (4), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c01012
  186. Morello-Frosch, R., M. Pastor, J. Sadd, and S.B. Shonkoff, 2009: The Climate Gap: Inequalities in How Climate Change Hurts Americans & How to Close the Gap. University of California, Berkeley, Program for Environmnetal and Regional Equity, 31 pp. https://dornsife.usc.edu/eri/publications/the-climate-gap-inequalities-in-how-climate-change-hurts-americans-how-to-close-the-gap/
  187. Nardone, A., J.A. Casey, R. Morello-Frosch, M. Mujahid, J.R. Balmes, and N. Thakur, 2020: Associations between historical residential redlining and current age-adjusted rates of emergency department visits due to asthma across eight cities in California: An ecological study. The Lancet Planetary Health, 4 (1), e24–e31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(19)30241-4
  188. Berberian, A.G., D.J.X. Gonzalez, and L.J. Cushing, 2022: Racial disparities in climate change-related health effects in the United States. Current Environmental Health Reports, 9 (3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-022-00360-w
  189. Thind, M.P.S., C.W. Tessum, I.L. Azevedo, and J.D. Marshall, 2019: Fine particulate air pollution from electricity generation in the US: Health impacts by race, income, and geography. Environmental Science & Technology, 53 (23), 14010–14019. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02527
  190. James, S.E., J.L. Herman, S. Rankin, M. Keisling, L. Mottet, and M. Anafi, 2016: The Report of the 2015 US Transgender Survey. National Center for Transgender Equality, Washington, DC. https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec17.pdf
  191. Semega, J., M. Kollar, J. Creamer, and A. Mohanty, 2020: Income and Poverty in the United States: 2018. U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P60-266(RV). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2019/demo/p60-266.html
  192. Belsey-Priebe, M., D. Lyons, and J.J. Buonocore, 2021: COVID-19’s impact on American women’s food insecurity foreshadows vulnerabilities to climate change. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (13). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136867
  193. Goldsmith, L., V. Raditz, and M. Méndez, 2022: Queer and present danger: Understanding the disparate impacts of disasters on LGBTQ+ communities. Disasters, 46 (4), 946–973. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12509
  194. Jeffers, N.K. and N. Glass, 2020: Integrative review of pregnancy and birth outcomes after exposure to a hurricane. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 49 (4), 348–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2020.04.006
  195. He, S., T. Kosatsky, A. Smargiassi, M. Bilodeau-Bertrand, and N. Auger, 2018: Heat and pregnancy-related emergencies: Risk of placental abruption during hot weather. Environment International, 111, 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.11.004
  196. Hoyert, D.L., 2023: Maternal Mortality Rates in the United States, 2021. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc:124678
  197. Cushing, L., R. Morello-Frosch, and A. Hubbard, 2022: Extreme heat and its association with social disparities in the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 36 (1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12834
  198. Smith, G.S., E. Anjum, C. Francis, L. Deanes, and C. Acey, 2022: Climate change, environmental disasters, and health inequities: The underlying role of structural inequalities. Current Environmental Health Reports, 9 (1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-022-00336-w
  199. Nomura, Y., J.H. Newcorn, C. Ginalis, C. Heitz, J. Zaki, F. Khan, M. Nasrin, K. Sie, D. DeIngeniis, and Y.L. Hurd, 2023: Prenatal exposure to a natural disaster and early development of psychiatric disorders during the preschool years: Stress in pregnancy study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13698
  200. Dominey-Howes, D., A. Gorman-Murray, and S. McKinnon, 2014: Queering disasters: On the need to account for LGBTI experiences in natural disaster contexts. Gender, Place & Culture, 21 (7), 905–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2013.802673
  201. Haskell, B., 2014: Sexuality and Natural Disaster: Challenges of LGBT Communities Facing Hurricane Katrina. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2513650
  202. Vinyeta, K., K. Powys Whyte, and K. Lynn, 2015: Climate Change Through an Intersectional Lens: Gendered Vulnerability and Resilience in Indigenous Communities in the United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-923. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, 72 pp. https://doi.org/10.2737/pnw-gtr-923
  203. Stukes, P.A. 2014: A Caravan of Hope-Gay Christian Service: Exploring Social Vulnerability and Capacity-Building of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex Identified Individuals and Organizational Advocacy in Two Post Katrina Disaster Environments. Doctor of Philosophy, Texas Woman’s University. https://hdl.handle.net/11274/11265
  204. Simmonds, K.E., J. Jenkins, B. White, P.K. Nicholas, and J. Bell, 2022: Health impacts of climate change on gender diverse populations: A scoping review. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 54 (1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12701
  205. Hess, J.J., N. Ranadive, C. Boyer, L. Aleksandrowicz, S.C. Anenberg, K. Aunan, K. Belesova, M.L. Bell, S. Bickersteth, K. Bowen, M. Burden, D. Campbell-Lendrum, E. Carlton, G. Cissé, F. Cohen, H. Dai, A.D. Dangour, P. Dasgupta, H. Frumkin, P. Gong, R.J. Gould, A. Haines, S. Hales, I. Hamilton, T. Hasegawa, M. Hashizume, Y. Honda, D.E. Horton, A. Karambelas, H. Kim, S.E. Kim, P.L. Kinney, I. Kone, K. Knowlton, J. Lelieveld, V.S. Limaye, Q. Liu, L. Madaniyazi, M.E. Martinez, D.L. Mauzerall, J. Milner, T. Neville, M. Nieuwenhuijsen, S. Pachauri, F. Perera, H. Pineo, J.V. Remais, R.K. Saari, J. Sampedro, P. Scheelbeek, J. Schwartz, D. Shindell, P. Shyamsundar, T.J. Taylor, C. Tonne, D. Van Vuuren, C. Wang, N. Watts, J.J. West, P. Wilkinson, S.A. Wood, J. Woodcock, A. Woodward, Y. Xie, Y. Zhang, and K.L. Ebi, 2020: Guidelines for modeling and reporting health effects of climate change mitigation actions. Environmental Health Perspectives, 128 (11), 115001. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp6745
  206. Quintana, A.V., R. Venkatraman, S.B. Coleman, D. Martins, and S.H. Mayhew, 2021: COP26: An opportunity to shape climate-resilient health systems and research. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5 (12), e852–e853. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00289-8
  207. WHO, 2015: Operational Framework for Building Climate Resilient Health Systems. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 47 pp. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/189951
  208. Zhang, W. and G. Villarini, 2020: Deadly compound heat stress-flooding hazard across the central United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 47 (15), e2020GL089185. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl089185
  209. Manangan, A.P. and B. Gillespie, 2022: Environmental Health Nexus Webinar—Climate Change and Health: The Risks to Community Health and Healthcare Utilization. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice. https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/ehsp/ehnexus/learn/documents/hrsa-webinar_march-17-2022-508.pdf
  210. Rublee, C., 2020: Living in a thin dark line: How can we make healthcare systems climate resilient? BMJ Opinion. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/09/15/living-in-a-thin-dark-line-how-can-we-make-healthcare-systems-climate-resilient/
  211. Eckelman, M.J., K. Huang, R. Lagasse, E. Senay, R. Dubrow, and J.D. Sherman, 2020: Health care pollution and public health damage in the United States: An update. Health Affairs, 39 (12), 2071–2079. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01247
  212. Lenzen, M., A. Malik, M. Li, J. Fry, H. Weisz, P.-P. Pichler, L.S.M. Chaves, A. Capon, and D. Pencheon, 2020: The environmental footprint of health care: A global assessment. The Lancet Planetary Health, 4 (7), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(20)30121-2
  213. Lelieveld, J., K. Klingmüller, A. Pozzer, R.T. Burnett, A. Haines, and V. Ramanathan, 2019: Effects of fossil fuel and total anthropogenic emission removal on public health and climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116 (15), 7192–7197. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1819989116
  214. Fu, P., X. Guo, F.M.H. Cheung, and K.K.L. Yung, 2019: The association between PM2.5 exposure and neurological disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 655, 1240–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.218
  215. Armstrong, P., B. Jackson, D. Haselow, V. Fields, M. Ireland, C. Austin, K. Signs, V. Fialkowski, R. Patel, P. Ellis, P. Iwen, C. Pedati, S. Gibbons-Burgener, J. Anderson, T. Dobbs, S. Davidson, M. McIntyre, K. Warren, J. Midla, N. Luong, and K. Benedict, 2018: Multistate epidemiology of histoplasmosis, United States, 2011–2014. Emerging Infectious Disease Journal, 24 (3), 425. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2403.171258
  216. Gray, E.B. and B.L. Herwaldt, 2019: Babesiosis surveillance—United States, 2011–2015. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries, 68 (6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6806a1
  217. Groseclose, S.L. and D.L. Buckeridge, 2017: Public health surveillance systems: Recent advances in their use and evaluation. Annual Review of Public Health, 38 (1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044348
  218. Bartlow, A.W., C. Manore, C. Xu, K.A. Kaufeld, S. Del Valle, A. Ziemann, G. Fairchild, and J.M. Fair, 2019: Forecasting zoonotic infectious disease response to climate change: Mosquito vectors and a changing environment. Veterinary Sciences, 6 (2), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci6020040
  219. Morin, C.W., J.C. Semenza, J.M. Trtanj, G.E. Glass, C. Boyer, and K.L. Ebi, 2018: Unexplored opportunities: Use of climate- and weather-driven early warning systems to reduce the burden of infectious diseases. Current Environmental Health Reports, 5 (4), 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-018-0221-0
  220. Wimberly, M.C., J.K. Davis, M.B. Hildreth, and J.L. Clayton, 2022: Integrated forecasts based on public health surveillance and meteorological data predict West Nile virus in a high-risk region of North America. Environmental Health Perspectives, 130 (8), 087006. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp10287
  221. Khan, I., F. Hou, and H.P. Le, 2021: The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: Fresh evidence from the United States of America. Science of The Total Environment, 754, 142222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142222
  222. Vespa, J., D.M. Armstrong, and L. Medina, 2018: Demographic Turning Points for the United States: Population Projections for 2020 to 2060. P25-1144. U.S. Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2020/demo/p25-1144.html
  223. Lo, Y.T.E., D.M. Mitchell, A. Gasparrini, A.M. Vicedo-Cabrera, K.L. Ebi, P.C. Frumhoff, R.J. Millar, W. Roberts, F. Sera, S. Sparrow, P. Uhe, and G. Williams, 2019: Increasing mitigation ambition to meet the Paris Agreement’s temperature goal avoids substantial heat-related mortality in U.S. cities. Science Advances, 5 (6), 4373. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4373
  224. Rohat, G., O. Wilhelmi, J. Flacke, A. Monaghan, J. Gao, M. van Maarseveen, and H. Dao, 2021: Assessing urban heat-related adaptation strategies under multiple futures for a major U.S. city. Climatic Change, 164 (3), 61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-02990-9
  225. Vanos, J.K., J.W. Baldwin, O. Jay, and K.L. Ebi, 2020: Simplicity lacks robustness when projecting heat-health outcomes in a changing climate. Nature Communications, 11 (1), 6079. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19994-1
  226. Wang, Y., F. Nordio, J. Nairn, A. Zanobetti, and J.D. Schwartz, 2018: Accounting for adaptation and intensity in projecting heat wave-related mortality. Environmental Research, 161, 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.049
  227. Wilhelmi, O.V., P.D. Howe, M.H. Hayden, and C.R. O’Lenick, 2021: Compounding hazards and intersecting vulnerabilities: Experiences and responses to extreme heat during COVID-19. Environmental Research Letters, 16 (8), 084060. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1760
  228. Reames, T.G., D.M. Daley, and J.C. Pierce, 2021: Exploring the nexus of energy burden, social capital, and environmental quality in shaping health in US counties. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (2), 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020620
  229. Shields, L., 2020: Bolstering Federal Energy Assistance and Weatherization With State Clean Energy Programs. National Conference of State Legislators. https://www.ncsl.org/energy/bolstering-federal-energy-assistance-and-weatherization-with-state-clean-energy-programs
  230. Tonn, B., E. Rose, and B. Hawkins, 2018: Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Weatherization Assistance Program: Impact results. Energy Policy, 118, 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.051
  231. Tonn, B., E. Rose, B. Hawkins, and M. Marincic, 2021: Health and financial benefits of weatherizing low-income homes in the southeastern United States. Building and Environment, 197, 107847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107847
  232. Fisk, W.J., B.C. Singer, and W.R. Chan, 2020: Association of residential energy efficiency retrofits with indoor environmental quality, comfort, and health: A review of empirical data. Building and Environment, 180, 107067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107067
  233. Abel, D.W., T. Holloway, M. Harkey, P. Meier, D. Ahl, V.S. Limaye, and J.A. Patz, 2018: Air-quality-related health impacts from climate change and from adaptation of cooling demand for buildings in the eastern United States: An interdisciplinary modeling study. PLoS Medicine, 15 (7), e1002599. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002599
  234. Jay, O., A. Capon, P. Berry, C. Broderick, R. de Dear, G. Havenith, Y. Honda, R.S. Kovats, W. Ma, A. Malik, N.B. Morris, L. Nybo, S.I. Seneviratne, J. Vanos, and K.L. Ebi, 2021: Reducing the health effects of hot weather and heat extremes: From personal cooling strategies to green cities. The Lancet, 398 (10301), 709–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01209-5
  235. Sailor, D.J., A. Baniassadi, C.R. O'Lenick, and O.V. Wilhelmi, 2019: The growing threat of heat disasters. Environmental Research Letters, 14 (5), 054006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab0bb9
  236. Stone Jr., B., E. Mallen, M. Rajput, C.J. Gronlund, A.M. Broadbent, E.S. Krayenhoff, G. Augenbroe, M.S. O’Neill, and M. Georgescu, 2021: Compound climate and infrastructure events: How electrical grid failure alters heat wave risk. Environmental Science & Technology, 55 (10), 6957–6964. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c00024
  237. USGCRP, 2018: Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II. Reidmiller, D.R., C.W. Avery, D.R. Easterling, K.E. Kunkel, K.L.M. Lewis, T.K. Maycock, and B.C. Stewart, Eds. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, 1515 pp. https://doi.org/10.7930/nca4.2018
  238. Williams, A.A., A. Baniassadi, P. Izaga Gonzalez, J.J. Buonocore, J.G. Cedeno-Laurent, and H.W. Samuelson, 2020: Health and climate benefits of heat adaptation strategies in single-family residential buildings. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 2, 561828. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2020.561828
  239. Grocholski, B., 2020: Cooling in a warming world. Science, 370 (6518), 776–777. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf1931
  240. Khosla, R., N.D. Miranda, P.A. Trotter, A. Mazzone, R. Renaldi, C. McElroy, F. Cohen, A. Jani, R. Perera-Salazar, and M. McCulloch, 2021: Cooling for sustainable development. Nature Sustainability, 4 (3), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00627-w
  241. Malik, A., C. Bongers, B. McBain, O. Rey-Lescure, R.d. Dear, A. Capon, M. Lenzen, and O. Jay, 2022: The potential for indoor fans to change air conditioning use while maintaining human thermal comfort during hot weather: An analysis of energy demand and associated greenhouse gas emissions. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6 (4), e301–e309. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(22)00042-0
  242. Prieto, A., U. Knaack, T. Auer, and T. Klein, 2018: Passive cooling & climate responsive façade design. Energy and Buildings, 175, 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.016
  243. Neumann, J.E., M. Amend, S. Anenberg, P.L. Kinney, M. Sarofim, J. Martinich, J. Lukens, J.-W. Xu, and H. Roman, 2021: Estimating PM2.5-related premature mortality and morbidity associated with future wildfire emissions in the western US. Environmental Research Letters, 16 (3), 035019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe82b
  244. UNEP, 2022: Spreading like Wildfire: The Rising Threat of Extraordinary Landscape Fires. A UNEP Rapid Response Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/spreading-wildfire-rising-threat-extraordinary-landscape-fires
  245. Stone, S.L., L. Anderko, M.F. Berger, C.R. Butler, W.E. Cascio, and A. Clune, 2019: Wildfire Smoke: A Guide for Public Health Officials. EPA-452/R-21-901. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.airnow.gov/sites/default/files/2021-09/wildfire-smoke-guide_0.pdf
  246. Rappold, A.G., M.C. Hano, S. Prince, L. Wei, S.M. Huang, C. Baghdikian, B. Stearns, X. Gao, S. Hoshiko, W.E. Cascio, D. Diaz-Sanchez, and B. Hubbell, 2019: Smoke sense initiative leverages citizen science to address the growing wildfire-related public health problem. GeoHealth, 3 (12), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gh000199
  247. Vaidyanathan, A., F. Yip, and P. Garbe, 2018: Developing an online tool for identifying at-risk populations to wildfire smoke hazards. Science of The Total Environment, 619–620, 376–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.270
  248. Jones, R.T., T.H. Ant, M.M. Cameron, and J.G. Logan, 2021: Novel control strategies for mosquito-borne diseases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376 (1818), 20190802. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0802
  249. Mafra-Neto, A. and T. Dekker, 2019: Novel odor-based strategies for integrated management of vectors of disease. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 34, 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2019.05.007
  250. Mwingira, V., L.E.G. Mboera, M. Dicke, and W. Takken, 2020: Exploiting the chemical ecology of mosquito oviposition behavior in mosquito surveillance and control: A review. Journal of Vector Ecology, 45 (2), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvec.12387
  251. Davis, C., A.K. Murphy, H. Bambrick, G.J. Devine, F.D. Frentiu, L. Yakob, X. Huang, Z. Li, W. Yang, G. Williams, and W. Hu, 2021: A regional suitable conditions index to forecast the impact of climate change on dengue vectorial capacity. Environmental Research, 195, 110849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110849
  252. Davis, J.K., G.P. Vincent, M.B. Hildreth, L. Kightlinger, C. Carlson, and M.C. Wimberly, 2018: Improving the prediction of arbovirus outbreaks: A comparison of climate-driven models for West Nile virus in an endemic region of the United States. Acta Tropica, 185, 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.04.028
  253. Muñoz, Á.G., X. Chourio, A. Rivière-Cinnamond, M.A. Diuk-Wasser, P.A. Kache, E.A. Mordecai, L. Harrington, and M.C. Thomson, 2020: AeDES: A next-generation monitoring and forecasting system for environmental suitability of Aedes-borne disease transmission. Scientific Reports, 10 (1), 12640. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69625-4
  254. Peper, S.T., D.E. Dawson, N. Dacko, K. Athanasiou, J. Hunter, F. Loko, S. Almas, G.E. Sorensen, K.N. Urban, A.N. Wilson-Fallon, K.M. Haydett, H.S. Greenberg, A.G. Gibson, and S.M. Presley, 2018: Predictive modeling for West Nile virus and mosquito surveillance in Lubbock, Texas. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 34 (1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.2987/17-6714.1
  255. Johnson, B.J., D. Brosch, A. Christiansen, E. Wells, M. Wells, A.F. Bhandoola, A. Milne, S. Garrison, and D.M. Fonseca, 2018: Neighbors help neighbors control urban mosquitoes. Scientific Reports, 8 (1), 15797. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34161-9
  256. Juarez, J.G., E. Carbajal, K.L. Dickinson, S. Garcia-Luna, N. Vuong, J.-P. Mutebi, R.R. Hemme, I. Badillo-Vargas, and G.L. Hamer, 2022: The unreachable doorbells of South Texas: Community engagement in colonias on the US-Mexico border for mosquito control. BMC Public Health, 22 (1), 1176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13426-z
  257. Sanson, A.V., J. Van Hoorn, and S.E.L. Burke, 2019: Responding to the impacts of the climate crisis on children and youth. Child Development Perspectives, 13 (4), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12342
  258. Marino, E., A. Jerolleman, and J. Maldonado, 2019: Law and policy for adaptation and relocation meeting: Summary report. Meeting of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO. National Center for Atmospheric Research. https://risingvoices.ucar.edu/sites/default/files/Law%20%26%20Policy%20for%20Adaptation%20%26%20Relocation%20Meeting%20Summary%20Report.pdf
  259. Thomas, K., R.D. Hardy, H. Lazrus, M. Mendez, B. Orlove, I. Rivera-Collazo, J.T. Roberts, M. Rockman, B.P. Warner, and R. Winthrop, 2019: Explaining differential vulnerability to climate change: A social science review. WIREs Climate Change, 10 (2), e565. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.565
  260. Maldonado, J., I.F.C. Wang, F. Eningowuk, L. Iaukea, A. Lascurain, H. Lazrus, C.A. Naquin, J.R. Naquin, K.M. Nogueras-Vidal, K. Peterson, I. Rivera-Collazo, M.K. Souza, M. Stege, and B. Thomas, 2021: Addressing the challenges of climate-driven community-led resettlement and site expansion: Knowledge sharing, storytelling, healing, and collaborative coalition building. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 11 (3), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-021-00695-0
  261. Adlam, C., D. Almendariz, R.W. Goode, D.J. Martinez, and B.R. Middleton, 2021: Keepers of the flame: Supporting the revitalization of Indigenous cultural burning. Society & Natural Resources, 35 (5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2021.2006385
  262. Redvers, N., 2021: The determinants of planetary health. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5 (3), e111–e112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00008-5
  263. Redvers, N., Y. Celidwen, C. Schultz, O. Horn, C. Githaiga, M. Vera, M. Perdrisat, L. Mad Plume, D. Kobei, M.C. Kain, A. Poelina, J.N. Rojas, and B.S. Blondin, 2022: The determinants of planetary health: An Indigenous consensus perspective. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6 (2), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00354-5
  264. Donatuto, J., L. Campbell, and R. Gregory, 2016: Developing responsive indicators of Indigenous community health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13 (9), 899. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13090899
  265. Donatuto, J., L. Campbell, and W. Trousdale, 2020: The “value” of values-driven data in identifying Indigenous health and climate change priorities. Climatic Change, 158 (2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02596-2
  266. Rice, J.L., D.A. Cohen, J. Long, and J.R. Jurjevich, 2020: Contradictions of the climate-friendly city: New perspectives on eco-gentrification and housing justice. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44 (1), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12740
  267. Rising Voices, 2022: Dialogues on centering justice in the National Climate Assessment. In: Centering Justice and Weaving in a Diversity of Knowledges and Experiences Into the Fifth National Climate Assessment (NCA5). 17 February 2022. National Center for Atmospheric Research. https://secasc.ncsu.edu/event/dialogues-on-centering-justice-in-the-national-climate-assessment/
  268. Mallen, E., H.A. Joseph, M. McLaughlin, D.Q. English, C. Olmedo, M. Roach, C. Tirdea, J. Vargo, M. Wolff, and E. York, 2022: Overcoming barriers to successful climate and health Adaptation Practice: Notes from the field. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (12), 7169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127169
  269. Romanello, M., C. Di Napoli, P. Drummond, C. Green, H. Kennard, P. Lampard, D. Scamman, N. Arnell, S. Ayeb-Karlsson, L.B. Ford, K. Belesova, K. Bowen, W. Cai, M. Callaghan, D. Campbell-Lendrum, J. Chambers, K.R. van Daalen, C. Dalin, N. Dasandi, S. Dasgupta, M. Davies, P. Dominguez-Salas, R. Dubrow, K.L. Ebi, M. Eckelman, P. Ekins, L.E. Escobar, L. Georgeson, H. Graham, S.H. Gunther, I. Hamilton, Y. Hang, R. Hänninen, S. Hartinger, K. He, J.J. Hess, S.-C. Hsu, S. Jankin, L. Jamart, O. Jay, I. Kelman, G. Kiesewetter, P. Kinney, T. Kjellstrom, D. Kniveton, J.K.W. Lee, B. Lemke, Y. Liu, Z. Liu, M. Lott, M.L. Batista, R. Lowe, F. MacGuire, M.O. Sewe, J. Martinez-Urtaza, M. Maslin, L. McAllister, A. McGushin, C. McMichael, Z. Mi, J. Milner, K. Minor, J.C. Minx, N. Mohajeri, M. Moradi-Lakeh, K. Morrissey, S. Munzert, K.A. Murray, T. Neville, M. Nilsson, N. Obradovich, M.B. O'Hare, T. Oreszczyn, M. Otto, F. Owfi, O. Pearman, M. Rabbaniha, E.J.Z. Robinson, J. Rocklöv, R.N. Salas, J.C. Semenza, J.D. Sherman, L. Shi, J. Shumake-Guillemot, G. Silbert, M. Sofiev, M. Springmann, J. Stowell, M. Tabatabaei, J. Taylor, J. Triñanes, F. Wagner, P. Wilkinson, M. Winning, M. Yglesias-González, S. Zhang, P. Gong, H. Montgomery, and A. Costello, 2022: The 2022 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: Health at the mercy of fossil fuels. The Lancet, 400 (10363), 1619–1654. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01540-9
  270. Gaskin, C.J., D. Taylor, S. Kinnear, J. Mann, W. Hillman, and M. Moran, 2017: Factors associated with the climate change vulnerability and the adaptive capacity of people with disability: A systematic review. Weather, Climate, and Society, 9 (4), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-16-0126.1
  271. Stein, P.J.S., M.A. Stein, N. Groce, and M. Kett, 2023: The role of the scientific community in strengthening disability-inclusive climate resilience. Nature Climate Change, 13 (2), 108–109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01564-6
  272. Krajeski, R., 2018: Framing disaster: Concepts and jargon in disaster research. In: Natural Hazards Center Workshop. Boulder, CO. Natural Hazards Center. https://hazards.colorado.edu/workshop/2018/session/framing-disaster-concepts-and-jargon-in-disaster-research
  273. Peterson, K.J., 2020: Ch. 7. Sojourners in a new land: Hope and adaptive traditions. In: Louisiana's Response to Extreme Weather: A Coastal State's Adaptation Challenges and Successes. Laska, S., Ed. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27205-0_7
  274. Rising Voices, 2019: Converging voices: Building relationships & practices for Intercultural science. In: 7th Annual Rising Voices Workshop. Boulder, CO, 15–19 May 2019. National Center for Atmospheric Research. https://risingvoices.ucar.edu/sites/default/files/2021-11/RV7%20Workshop%20Report.pdf
  275. Crimmins, A., J. Balbus, J.L. Gamble, D.R. Easterling, K.L. Ebi, J. Hess, K.E. Kunkel, D.M. Mills, and M.C. Sarofim, 2016: Appendix 1: Technical support document: Modeling future climate impacts on human health. In: The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, 287–300. https://doi.org/10.7930/j0kh0k83
  276. EPA, 2023: How Climate Change Affects Human Health. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/climateimpacts/climate-change-and-human-health#how
  277. Dahl, K. and R. Licker, 2021: Too Hot to Work: Assessing the Threats Climate Change Poses to Outdoor Workers. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.47923/2021.14236
  278. Cissé, G., R. McLeman, H. Adams, P. Aldunce, K. Bowen, D. Campbell-Lendrum, S. Clayton, K.L. Ebi, J. Hess, C. Huang, Q. Liu, G. McGregor, J. Semenza, and M.C. Tirado, 2022: Ch. 7. Health, wellbeing, and the changing structure of communities. In: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Pörtner, H.-O., D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, and B. Rama, Eds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, 1041–1170. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.009
  279. Dasgupta, S. and E.J.Z. Robinson, 2022: Attributing changes in food insecurity to a changing climate. Scientific Reports, 12 (1), 4709. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08696-x
  280. Ebi, K.L., N.H. Ogden, J.C. Semenza, and A. Woodward, 2017: Detecting and attributing health burdens to climate change. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125, 085004. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp1509
  281. Mitchell, D., 2021: Climate attribution of heat mortality. Nature Climate Change, 11 (6), 467–468. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01049-y
  282. Ebi, K.L., 2022: Methods for quantifying, projecting, and managing the health risks of climate change. NEJM Evidence, 1 (8). https://doi.org/10.1056/evidra2200002
  283. Couper, L.I., J.E. Farner, J.M. Caldwell, M.L. Childs, M.J. Harris, D.G. Kirk, N. Nova, M. Shocket, E.B. Skinner, L.H. Uricchio, M. Exposito-Alonso, and E.A. Mordecai, 2021: How will mosquitoes adapt to climate warming? eLife, 10, e69630. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.69630
  284. Holeva-Eklund, W.M., S.J. Young, J. Will, N. Busser, J. Townsend, and C.M. Hepp, 2022: Species distribution modeling of Aedes aegypti in Maricopa County, Arizona from 2014 to 2020. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1001190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1001190
  285. Walker, K.R., D. Williamson, Y. Carrière, P.A. Reyes-Castro, S. Haenchen, M.H. Hayden, E. Jeffrey Gutierrez, and K.C. Ernst, 2018: Socioeconomic and human behavioral factors associated with Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) immature habitat in Tucson, AZ. Journal of Medical Entomology, 55 (4), 955–963. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjy011
  286. Groenewold, M.R. and S.L. Baron, 2013: The proportion of work-related emergency department visits not expected to be paid by workers’ compensation: Implications for occupational health surveillance, research, policy, and health equity. Health Services Research, 48 (6pt1), 1939–1959. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12066
  287. Shire, J., A. Vaidyanathan, M. Lackovic, and T. Bunn, 2020: Association between work-related hyperthermia emergency department visits and ambient heat in five southeastern states, 2010–2012—A case-crossover study. GeoHealth, 4 (8), 2019GH000241. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gh000241
  288. NIOSH, 2016: Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to Heat and Hot Environments. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication Number 2016–106. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2016-106/default.html
  289. Delmelle, E.M., M.R. Desjardins, P. Jung, C. Owusu, Y. Lan, A. Hohl, and C. Dony, 2022: Uncertainty in geospatial health: Challenges and opportunities ahead. Annals of Epidemiology, 65, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.10.002
  290. BLS, 2020: Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Data Quality Research. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, accessed April 23, 2023. https://www.bls.gov/iif/data-quality-research/data-quality.htm
  291. Michaels, D. and J. Barab, 2020: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration at 50: Protecting workers in a changing economy. American Journal of Public Health, 110 (5), 631–635. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2020.305597
  292. Adepoju, O.E., D. Han, M. Chae, K.L. Smith, L. Gilbert, S. Choudhury, and L. Woodard, 2021: Health disparities and climate change: The intersection of three disaster events on vulnerable communities in Houston, Texas. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010035
  293. Busby, J.W., K. Baker, M.D. Bazilian, A.Q. Gilbert, E. Grubert, V. Rai, J.D. Rhods, S. Shidore, C.A. Smith, and M.E. Webber, 2021: Cascading risks: Understanding the 2021 winter blackout in Texas. Energy Research & Social Science, 77, 102106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102106
  294. Schiermeier, Q., 2021: Freak US winters linked to Arctic warming. Nature, 597 (7875), 165. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02402-z
  295. Gronlund, C.J., K.P. Sullivan, Y. Kefelegn, L. Cameron, and M.S. O'Neill, 2018: Climate change and temperature extremes: A review of heat- and cold-related morbidity and mortality concerns of municipalities. Maturitas, 114, 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.06.002
  296. Gupta, A., R. Soni, and M. Ganguli, 2021: Frostbite—Manifestation and mitigation. Burns Open, 5 (3), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burnso.2021.04.002
  297. Son, J.-Y., J.C. Liu, and M.L. Bell, 2019: Temperature-related mortality: A systematic review and investigation of effect modifiers. Environmental Research Letters, 14 (7), 073004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1cdb
  298. Cianconi, P., S. Betrò, and L. Janiri, 2020: The impact of climate change on mental health: A systematic descriptive review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 74. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00074
  299. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2020: A Framework for Assessing Mortality and Morbidity After Large-Scale Disasters. MacKenzie, E.J., S.H. Wollek, O.C. Yost, and D.L. Cork, Eds. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 272 pp. https://doi.org/10.17226/25863
  300. Marazzi, M., M. Boriana, and J.B. Gustavo, 2022: Mortality of Puerto Ricans in the USA post Hurricane Maria: An interrupted time series analysis. BMJ Open, 12 (8), e058315. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058315
  301. Arendt, S., L. Rajagopal, C. Strohbehn, N. Stokes, J. Meyer, and S. Mandernach, 2013: Reporting of foodborne illness by U.S. consumers and healthcare professionals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10 (8), 3684–3714. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10083684
  302. Watts, N., M. Amann, N. Arnell, S. Ayeb-Karlsson, K. Belesova, M. Boykoff, P. Byass, W. Cai, D. Campbell-Lendrum, S. Capstick, J. Chambers, C. Dalin, M. Daly, N. Dasandi, M. Davies, P. Drummond, R. Dubrow, K.L. Ebi, M. Eckelman, P. Ekins, L.E. Escobar, L. Fernandez Montoya, L. Georgeson, H. Graham, P. Haggar, I. Hamilton, S. Hartinger, J. Hess, I. Kelman, G. Kiesewetter, T. Kjellstrom, D. Kniveton, B. Lemke, Y. Liu, M. Lott, R. Lowe, M.O. Sewe, J. Martinez-Urtaza, M. Maslin, L. McAllister, A. McGushin, S. Jankin Mikhaylov, J. Milner, M. Moradi-Lakeh, K. Morrissey, K. Murray, S. Munzert, M. Nilsson, T. Neville, T. Oreszczyn, F. Owfi, O. Pearman, D. Pencheon, D. Phung, S. Pye, R. Quinn, M. Rabbaniha, E. Robinson, J. Rocklöv, J.C. Semenza, J. Sherman, J. Shumake-Guillemot, M. Tabatabaei, J. Taylor, J. Trinanes, P. Wilkinson, A. Costello, P. Gong, and H. Montgomery, 2019: The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: Ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate. The Lancet, 394 (10211), 1836–1878. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32596-6
  303. EPA, 2023: Climate Change and Human Health: Who’s Most at Risk? U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/climateimpacts/climate-change-and-human-health-whos-most-risk
  304. Lee, D. and H.M. Murphy, 2020: Private wells and rural health: Groundwater contaminants of emerging concern. Current Environmental Health Reports, 7 (2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-020-00267-4
  305. ERS, 2023: Food & Nutrition Assistance: Food Security in the U.S.—Key Statistics & Graphics. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-u-s/key-statistics-graphics/
  306. Macdiarmid, J.I. and S. Whybrow, 2019: Nutrition from a climate change perspective. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 78 (3), 380–387. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665118002896
  307. Zhang, R., X. Tang, J. Liu, M. Visbeck, H. Guo, V. Murray, C. McGillycuddy, B. Ke, G. Kalonji, P. Zhai, X. Shi, J. Lu, X. Zhou, H. Kan, Q. Han, Q. Ye, Y. Luo, J. Chen, W. Cai, H. Ouyang, R. Djalante, A. Baklanov, L. Ren, G. Brasseur, G.F. Gao, and L. Zhou, 2022: From concept to action: A united, holistic and One Health approach to respond to the climate change crisis. Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 11 (1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-022-00941-9
  308. Roos, N., S. Kovats, S. Hajat, V. Filippi, M. Chersich, S. Luchters, F. Scorgie, B. Nakstad, O. Stephansson, and C. Consortium, 2021: Maternal and newborn health risks of climate change: A call for awareness and global action. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 100 (4), 566–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14124
  309. Smith, K.H., A.J. Tyre, J. Hamik, M.J. Hayes, Y. Zhou, and L. Dai, 2020: Using climate to explain and predict West Nile virus risk in Nebraska. GeoHealth, 4 (9), e2020GH000244. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gh000244
  310. Jodoin, S., A. Buettgen, N. Groce, P. Gurung, C. Kaiser, M. Kett, M. Keogh, S.S. Macanawai, Y. Muñoz, I. Powaseu, M.A. Stein, P.J.S. Stein, and E. Youssefian, 2023: Nothing about us without us: The urgent need for disability-inclusive climate research. PLoS Climate, 2 (3), e0000153. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000153
  311. Chakraborty, J., 2020: Unequal proximity to environmental pollution: An intersectional analysis of people with disabilities in Harris County, Texas. The Professional Geographer, 72 (4), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2020.1787181
  312. Chakraborty, J., S.E. Grineski, and T.W. Collins, 2019: Hurricane Harvey and people with disabilities: Disproportionate exposure to flooding in Houston, Texas. Social Science & Medicine, 226, 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.039
  313. Dame-Griff, E.C., 2022: What do we mean when we say “Latinx?”: Definitional power, the limits of inclusivity, and the (un/re)constitution of an identity category. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 15 (2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2021.1901957
  314. Borrell, L.N. and S.E. Echeverria, 2022: The use of Latinx in public health research when referencing Hispanic or Latino populations. Social Science & Medicine, 302, 114977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114977
  315. María del Río-González, A., 2021: To Latinx or not to Latinx: A question of gender inclusivity versus gender neutrality. American Journal of Public Health, 111 (6), 1018–1021. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2021.306238
  316. Anderson, H., C. Brown, L.L. Cameron, M. Christenson, K.C. Conlon, S. Dorevitch, J. Dumas, M. Eidson, A. Ferguson, E. Grossman, A. Hanson, J.J. Hess, B. Hoppe, J. Horton, M. Jagger, S. Krueger, T.W. Largo, G.M. Losurdo, S.R. Mack, C. Moran, C. Mutnansky, K. Raab, S. Saha, P.J. Schramm, A. Shipp-Hilts, S.J. Smith, M. Thelen, L. Thie, and R. Walker, 2017: Climate and Health Intervention Assessment: Evidence on Public Health Interventions to Prevent the Negative Health Effects of Climate Change. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Climate and Health Program, Atlanta, GA. https://www.cdc.gov/climateandhealth/docs/climateandhealthinterventionassessment_508.pdf
  317. Abbinett, J., P.J. Schramm, S. Widerynski, S. Saha, S. Beavers, M. Eaglin, U. Lei, S.G. Nayak, M. Roach, M. Wolff, K.C. Conlon, and L. Thie, 2020: Heat Response Plans: Summary of Evidence and Strategies for Collaboration and Implementation. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/93705
  318. EPA, 2023: Public Health Adaptation Strategies for Climate Change. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/arc-x/public-health-adaptation-strategies-climate-change
  319. Sharifi, A., M. Pathak, C. Joshi, and B.-J. He, 2021: A systematic review of the health co-benefits of urban climate change adaptation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 74, 103190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103190
  320. Saha, S., A. Vaidyanathan, F. Lo, C. Brown, and J.J. Hess, 2021: Short term physician visits and medication prescriptions for allergic disease associated with seasonal tree, grass, and weed pollen exposure across the United States. Environmental Health, 20 (1), 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-021-00766-3
  321. Schramm, P.J., C.L. Brown, S. Saha, K.C. Conlon, A.P. Manangan, J.E. Bell, and J.J. Hess, 2021: A systematic review of the effects of temperature and precipitation on pollen concentrations and season timing, and implications for human health. International Journal of Biometeorology, 65 (10), 1615–1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-021-02128-7
  322. Hall, J., F. Lo, S. Saha, A. Vaidyanathan, and J. Hess, 2020: Internet searches offer insight into early-season pollen patterns in observation-free zones. Scientific Reports, 10 (1), 11334. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68095-y
  323. Stein, Z., 2021: Syndromic surveillance for monitoring health impacts of pollen exposure. In: American Public Health Association Annual Meeting and Expo. Atlanta, GA. https://apha.confex.com/apha/2021/meetingapi.cgi/Paper/510876?filename=2021_Abstract510876.pdf&template=Word
  324. Aldrich, D.P. and M.A. Meyer, 2014: Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59 (2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550299
  325. Leiserowitz, A., E. Maibach, S. Rosenthal, and J. Kotcher, 2023: Climate Change in the American Mind: Politics & Policy. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/3413332/politics-policy-december-2022/4212751/
  326. Limaye, V.S., W. Max, J. Constible, and K. Knowlton, 2020: Estimating the costs of inaction and the economic benefits of addressing the health harms of climate change. Health Affairs, 39 (12), 2098–2104. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01109
  327. Goshua, A., J. Gomez, B. Erny, M. Burke, S. Luby, S. Sokolow, A.D. LaBeaud, P. Auerbach, M.A. Gisondi, and K. Nadeau, 2021: Addressing climate change and its effects on human health: A call to action for medical schools. Academic Medicine, 96 (3), 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003861
  328. Shea, B., K. Knowlton, and J. Shaman, 2020: Assessment of climate-health curricula at international health professions schools. JAMA Network Open, 3 (5), e206609. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6609
  329. Errett, N.A., K. Dolan, C. Hartwell, J. Vickery, and J.J. Hess, 2022: Adapting by their bootstraps: State and territorial public health agencies struggle to meet the mounting challenge of climate change. American Journal of Public Health, 112 (10), 1379–1381. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2022.307038
  330. University of Washington, 2023: What is Implementation Science? [Webpage], accessed May 25, 2023. https://impsciuw.org/implementation-science/learn/implementation-science-overview/

Previous Chapter
View All Figures
Next Chapter

Likelihood

Virtually Certain Very Likely Likely As Likely as Not Unlikely Very Unikely Exceptionally Unlikely
99%–100% 90%–100% 66%–100% 33%–66% 0%–33% 0%–10% 0%–1%

Confidence Level

Very High High Medium Low
  • Strong evidence (established theory, multiple sources, well-documented and accepted methods, etc.)
  • High consensus
  • Moderate evidence (several sources, some consistency, methods vary and/or documentation limited, etc.)
  • Medium consensus
  • Suggestive evidence (a few sources, limited consistency, methods emerging, etc.)
  • Competing schools of thought
  • Inconclusive evidence (limited sources, extrapolations, inconsistent findings, poor documentation and/or methods not tested, etc.)
  • Disagreement or lack of opinions among experts

GlobalChange.gov is made possible by our participating agencies

Department of Agriculture Department of Commerce Department of Defense Department of Energy Department of Health and Human Services Department of Homeland Security Department of Interior Department of State Department of Transportation Environmental Protection Agency NASA National Science Foundation Smithsonian Institute Agency for International Development
  • About USGCRP
  • FOIA requests
  • No FEAR Act
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
Looking for U.S. government information and services?
Visit USA.gov