Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

NCA5 Logo
    • About This Report
    • Guide to the Report
    • Report Credits
    • Companion Podcast
    • Additional Resources
    • About this Report
    • Guide to this Report
    • OVERVIEW
    • Physical Science
    • 2. Climate Trends
    • 3. Earth Systems Processes
    • National Topics
    • 4. Water
    • 5. Energy
    • 6. Land
    • 7. Forests
    • 8. Ecosystems
    • 9. Coasts
    • 10. Oceans
    • 11. Agriculture
    • 12. Built Environment
    • 13. Transportation
    • 14. Air Quality
    • 15. Human Health
    • 16. Indigenous Peoples
    • 17. International
    • 18. Complex Systems
    • 19. Economics
    • 20. Social Systems and Justice
    • Regions
    • 21. Northeast
    • 22. Southeast
    • 23. US Caribbean
    • 24. Midwest
    • 25. Northern Great Plains
    • 26. Southern Great Plains
    • 27. Northwest
    • 28. Southwest
    • 29. Alaska
    • 30. Hawai'i and US-Affiliated Pacific Islands
    • Responses
    • 31. Adaptation
    • 32. Mitigation
    • Focus On
    • F1. Compound Events
    • F2. Western Wildfires
    • F3. COVID-19 and Climate Change
    • F4. Risks to Supply Chains
    • F5. Blue Carbon
    • Appendices
    • A1. Process
    • A2. Information Quality
    • A3. Scenarios and Datasets
    • A4. Indicators
    • A5. Glossary

    • All Figures
    • All Key Messages
    • View All Report Downloads
    • Download Full Focus On PDF
    • Download Focus On Figures (.zip)
    • Descargar en Español
  • Art × Climate
  • NCA Atlas
  • EN ESPAÑOL
Western Wildfires
i

FOCUS
ON

Fifth National Climate Assessment
Western Wildfires

  • SECTIONS
  • Western Wildfires
  • Traceable Accounts
  • References
Previous Chapter
View All Figures
Next Chapter

Focus on Western Wildfires

Climate change is leading to larger and more severe wildfires in the western United States, bringing acute and chronic impacts both near and far from the flames. These wildfires have significant public health, socioeconomic, and ecological implications for the Nation.

Fire is a critical ecosystem process across the western US. In recent decades, wildfires in the western United States have become larger, hotter, and more destructive and deadly due to a suite of factors, including climate change. Prior to federal policy to suppress wildfires, natural wildfire and Indigenous burning ensured that landscapes benefited from regular fires for millennia (KM 28.5).1 Nineteenth- and early-20th-century land-use practices, followed by a policy of fire elimination, led to vegetation fuel buildup in low-elevation fire-adapted western forests, and livestock grazing promoted highly flammable annual grass dominance in rangelands (KMs 2.2, 7.1, 28.5).2,3,4 Development in the last 50 years has greatly expanded the wildland–urban interface (KMs 12.2, 28.5)5 and increased human-caused ignitions, jeopardizing people, property, and infrastructure.6,7 In recent years, climate change has contributed to very large and severe fires. While low- and moderate-severity fire with small patches of high severity can have important ecological benefits (Chs. 7, 28), large, high-severity fires often have profoundly negative long-term ecological, social, and economic consequences (Figure F2.1; KM 28.4).8,9

URL
Alternative text
Wildfire Impacts
A circular landscape schematic illustrates wildfire impacts. The landscape includes snow-capped mountain peaks with forests in the background, while the foreground includes forests, farms and crops, houses, large buildings, waterways, and roadways. Text and icons arranged around the circle note risks, with lines pointing to depictions of these risks on the landscape. The corresponding table in the caption provides related details. Clockwise from top, the impacts are as follows: 1) Fire suppression and past land use facilitated conditions prone to climate stress. 2) Human development increases the risk of human-caused ignitions. 3) Large and severe fires alter vegetation and habitat. Also, debris flows pose risks to water supplies. 4) Reduced access for recreation and other cultural practices. 5) Smoke-related health risks for outdoor workers. 6) Reducing risk of devastating fires is achievable through fuel reductions as well as community education and protection measures. 7) Risks to lives and property in the wildland–urban interface. 8) Risks to critical infrastructure, such as energy transmission. 9) Smoke-related health risks for sensitive people. 10) Fire can both increase and decrease the amount of snowmelt and runoff in undesirable ways.
  • wildfireWildfire: Causes and drivers
    Warming, shifts in precipitation, and a drier near-surface atmosphere are increasing the frequency of large fires and the area burned (KMs 2.2, 7.1).

  • Fire exclusion and past management in dry forests have increased climatic stress and fire risk (KM 28.5).

  • waterRisks: Water
    Particulates from wildfires reduce the albedo of snow and can accelerate snowmelt, influencing water retention and runoff (KM 28.5).

  • Burned areas are a debris-flow risk and threaten water supplies through erosion and particulates from smoke (KM 3.4).

  • peopleRisks: Society and culture
    Burned areas reduce access for recreation and other cultural uses (KMs 16.1, 28.5).

  • Wildfire generates substantial economic impacts, from whole sectors to individuals (KM 19.1).

  • leafRisks: Ecosystems
    Large burned areas, especially with high fire severity, can promote vegetation and habitat changes (KMs 6.1, 7.2, 8.1, 8.2).

  • houseRisks: Built environment
    Risks to critical infrastructure, energy, and water storage (KM 6.1).

  • Risks to personal safety and property and higher insurance costs for people living in the wildland–urban interface (KM 5.1).

  • heartRisks: Health
    Smoke can be transported thousands of miles; airborne particulate matter creates health risks, especially for those with existing health conditions, older adults, and children (KMs 14.2, 15.1, 28.4).

  • Smoke and long periods of degraded air quality create health risks for outdoor workers and firefighters (KM 28.4) and disproportionately affect vulnerable populations (KM 27.5).

  • treesOpportunities: Management and adaptation
    Adaptation of management strategies that create, maintain, and restore resilient forest ecosystems are critical to maintaining equitable provisioning of ecosystem services (KMs 7.3, 28.5, 31.1).

Climate change has increased the area burned and severity of wildfires and impacts on the environment, human health, and society.
Figure F2.1. Indicators and risks illustrate the drivers of, impacts from, and solutions to wildfire across a range of socioecological contexts within and beyond the western states. Considering these helps improve understanding of how impacts are experienced and how to adapt. Figure credit: USDA ARS, USDA Forest Service, University of Washington, and Montana Health Professionals for a Healthy Climate.

Climate change has produced warmer and drier conditions with prolonged droughts that stress forest vegetation, facilitating pest outbreaks and tree death, leading to the accumulation of surface fuel.10,11 Wildfires are moving up in elevation, due to warming temperatures, reduced snowpacks and summer precipitation, and overall drier conditions (KMs 2.2, 3.5, 7.1, 28.5). Climate change has also increased vapor pressure deficit that dries fuels, altering fire behavior that results in large, hotter, and more severe fires (KMs 7.1, 28.5).12,13,14,15 Consequently, the annual area burned and area burned by high-severity wildfires have increased in the West about eightfold since 1985 (Ch. 7).14,16 And while the annual area burned is on par with pre-European settlement, the very large, high-severity, and deadly and destructive wildfires result in significant socioecological and economic impacts. These trends are expected to continue at least to midcentury, when fuel availability is expected to become more limited in some western forests (KMs 3.5, 28.5).17

In some non-forested regions, primarily arid shrublands and steppes, changes in the frequency and extent of wildfires are being driven primarily by invasive annual grasses that have benefited from climate change.2,18 Intermountain West steppe rangelands are among the most threatened ecosystems in the US due to land use and wildfires, which have become larger and more frequent.19 In oak savanna and chaparral shrublands, historical increases in fire are linked to changes in human ignitions and land use.7,20

Further increases in area burned and wildfire severity are expected to alter the distribution and abundance of plants and animals and lead to biodiversity loss (KM 7.1). In some cases, forested areas that experienced repeated severe reburns have transitioned to shrublands or other vegetation types.21,22,23 Already, approximately 75% of vegetation type conversion in the Southwest is due to high-severity fire.24 Continued warming, reductions in precipitation in some areas, and more frequent fire in forest and non-forest ecosystems can facilitate the establishment of invasive species, increase fuel flammability, reduce tree regeneration after wildfires,18,25,26 and alter vegetation types (KMs 7.5, 28.5).27 Potential reductions in forest and shrub cover due to climate-driven changes and wildfire reduce the potential for some western forestlands and steppe rangelands to function as carbon sinks (KM 7.2).

Although restored fire regimes can benefit forest hydrology in some cases,28 wildfires can put critical infrastructure at risk by altering soil conditions and water runoff (KM 6.1). Following fire, intense rain on water-repellent soils can cause debris flows, which cause human deaths, property damage, and costly road closures (KM 6.1).29 Chemical runoff can contaminate water supplies, and excess sediment runoff can reduce reservoir storage capacity.30,31,32 Soot from fire emissions also darkens the surface of snow and ice, altering snow retention and melt in potentially undesirable ways.33,34

Human infrastructure can also affect wildfire risk. Although uncommon, fires caused by electrical transmission lines have been large and deadly. The 2018 Camp Fire nearly destroyed the entire town of Paradise, California, displacing tens of thousands of residents,35 many of whom have not returned. To reduce such ignitions, electrical grid power shutoffs are used during windy weather.36 However, this approach can disrupt local economies (e.g., agriculture and healthcare) and livelihoods, with disproportionately high impacts on rural and overburdened communities.37

Art × Climate
Carbon residue on muslin shows the word “paradise” in gray capital letters against a black background.

Cara Despain
it doesn't look like paradise anymore (Camp Fire 2018)
(2019, carbon residue from collected burnt debris on muslin)

Artist’s statement: For the last four years, I’ve collected burnt debris from wildfires and fires in the urban-interface zone in the western United States. I use them to create “carbon paintings” that serve as markers of a changing climate and sustained forest mismanagement, existing in memoriam of the consequences of human habitation on the planet. The text is the location of the fire, in this case Paradise, CA. These pure black expanses of soot still smell of smoke and are meant to conceptually inhabit the lineage of landscape painting while conveying the new reality of western lands' spent/wrecked vistas and places.

View the full Art × Climate gallery.

Artworks and artists’ statements are not official Assessment products.

Wildfire smoke can be transported thousands of miles, causing significant environmental, public health, and socioeconomic impacts across the country (KMs 14.1, 19.1, 25.1).38,39 Smoke from burning vegetation and built structures contains fine particulate matter (PM2.5), ozone precursors, and other toxic components (KM 14.2).40 Although the annual average level of PM2.5 has declined over recent decades due to air quality policies, the frequency and severity of smoke events in the western US make wildfire the largest contributor to PM2.5 in this region, offsetting some of those improvements (KM 14.1). Exposure to wildfire smoke is associated with adverse cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes (KM 15.1), as well as increased risks of COVID-19 mortality (Focus on COVID-19 and Climate Change).41,42 Wildfire smoke may also affect neonatal human health, such as lower birthweights or pregnancy loss.43,44

Projected changes in wildfire are expected to result in a significant health burden, especially for at-risk populations.45 Susceptibility to wildfire smoke exposure can be exacerbated by age, preexisting health conditions, socioeconomic status, occupation, and housing status (e.g., people who are unhoused experience constant exposure). Wildland firefighters are at increased risk of lung cancer mortality and cardiovascular diseases.46 Where wildfires overlap with harvest seasons, farmworkers and other outdoor workers (frequently low-income workers from immigrant and Indigenous communities) are at risk (KMs 14.2, 15.2, 16.1, 27.1, 28.4).

Enhancing ecosystem resilience and protecting communities from wildfires is achievable through investments in both ecosystems and social systems (KM 28.5). Proactive actions include strategically placing forest fuel treatments in high-fire-risk locations and accelerating vegetation management, including the use of fire at ecologically meaningful spatial scales. These actions often require surface and ladder fuel reductions through prescribed burning or mechanical removal47 and allowing low-intensity wildfires to burn in strategic locations (KMs 7.3, 28.5). In fire-adapted ecosystems, low- and moderate-severity wildfires reduce smaller trees, shrubs, and dead fuels, maintaining forests with fewer, more widely spaced trees (KMs 7.3, 28.5), thus increasing resilience to future climate impacts. Burned area rehabilitation efforts can reduce sediment runoff and protect water supply and hydroelectrical infrastructure (KMs 5.1, 7.1).

Efforts to strategically reduce the number of human-caused ignitions and investments in home hardening are important adaptation measures in some areas.7,20 Fireproofing structures and other design and construction efforts can reduce the likelihood of structure ignition, lessening wildfire risk to communities.48 Land and community planning practices—including zoning, ordinances, and building codes—influence wildfire risks to homes in wildfire-prone regions.49 Additional measures for protecting communities involve improvements in data access and usability, emergency response planning, healthcare system preparedness, and early-warning systems for evacuation and timely communication of health impacts to the public, especially for at-risk populations and outdoor workers (KMs 14.1, 19.3).

Authors
Federal Coordinating Lead Author
Allison R. Crimmins, US Global Change Research Program
Chapter Lead Author
Steven M. Ostoja, USDA Agricultural Research Service, California Climate Hub
Contributors
Technical Contributors
Robert G. Byron, Montana Health Professionals for a Healthy Climate
Amy E. East, US Geological Survey
Michael Méndez, University of California, Irvine
Susan M. O'Neill, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station
David L. Peterson, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station
Jeffrey R. Pierce, Colorado State University
Crystal Raymond, University of Washington, Climate Impacts Group
Aradhna Tripati, University of California, Los Angeles
Ambarish Vaidyanathan, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Review Editor
Ellen M. Considine, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics
USGCRP Coordinator
Christopher W. Avery, US Global Change Research Program / ICF
Recommended Citation

Ostoja, S.M., A.R. Crimmins, R.G. Byron, A.E. East, M. Méndez, S.M. O'Neill, D.L. Peterson, J.R. Pierce, C. Raymond, A. Tripati, and A. Vaidyanathan, 2023: Focus on western wildfires In: Fifth National Climate Assessment. Crimmins, A.R., C.W. Avery, D.R. Easterling, K.E. Kunkel, B.C. Stewart, and T.K. Maycock, Eds. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA. https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA5.2023.F2

Download citation: BibTeX     |     RIS

TRACEABLE ACCOUNTS

Description of Evidence Base and Research Gaps 

This focus box examines observed and projected wildfire trends for western North America and the impacts of wildfire nationally.3,38,50 This includes research that has used remotely sensed and modeled data, alongside field-based experimental and observational data, to demonstrate that the influence of climate change on current and future wildfire is through warming temperatures, which have reduced fuel moisture content and made the fuels more flammable.11,12,14,22 Research demonstrates that roughly half of the increase in area burned is due to increases in fuel flammability as a result of anthropogenic climate change (KMs 3.5, 7.1).12 Warming, lowered humidity, and atmospheric drying (i.e., higher vapor pressure deficit) have facilitated increases in the frequency of fire-conducive weather as well as of annual area burned and the proportion burned at high severity by wildfire (KM 2.2).14,16 Similar methods have also been used to elucidate factors influencing wildfire smoke pollutant mixture and the effects on human health.38,39,42

There is strong and building evidence that reducing forest fuels and lowering the density of trees in forests lessens the impact of climate-mediated stress and disturbance.4 Greater resistance and resilience to wildfire can be achieved through mechanical vegetation treatments with the use of prescribed fire and managed wildfire (KMs 7.3, 28.5). An increased and refined understanding of appropriate adaptation strategies to safeguard ecosystems, communities, and people could enhance outcomes of future investments.4 There is evidence that planning, zoning, updating building codes, and fireproofing structures can mitigate risk and losses to infrastructure and property.48,49 Key areas of future investigation include, but are not limited to, the appropriate suite of land-based practices (i.e., thinning, prescribed fire) as well as the ecosystem specificity (e.g., forest or vegetation type) and the appropriate spatial scale needed to meaningfully reduce risk.15 Lastly, an increased understanding of the composition of rural populations in the western US, how different subsets of the population access information, and behavioral responses to wildfire-related alerts would allow for more targeted messaging and more informed allocation of resources during wildfire and smoke events.45

REFERENCES

  1. Margolis, E.Q., C.H. Guiterman, R.D. Chavardès, J.D. Coop, K. Copes-Gerbitz, D.A. Dawe, D.A. Falk, J.D. Johnston, E. Larson, H. Li, J.M. Marschall, C.E. Naficy, A.T. Naito, M.-A. Parisien, S.A. Parks, J. Portier, H.M. Poulos, K.M. Robertson, J.H. Speer, M. Stambaugh, T.W. Swetnam, A.J. Tepley, I. Thapa, C.D. Allen, Y. Bergeron, L.D. Daniels, P.Z. Fulé, D. Gervais, M.P. Girardin, G.L. Harley, J.E. Harvey, K.M. Hoffman, J.M. Huffman, M.D. Hurteau, L.B. Johnson, C.W. Lafon, M.K. Lopez, R.S. Maxwell, J. Meunier, M. North, M.T. Rother, M.R. Schmidt, R.L. Sherriff, L.A. Stachowiak, A. Taylor, E.J. Taylor, V. Trouet, M.L. Villarreal, L.L. Yocom, K.B. Arabas, A.H. Arizpe, D. Arseneault, A.A. Tarancón, C. Baisan, E. Bigio, F. Biondi, G.D. Cahalan, A. Caprio, J. Cerano-Paredes, B.M. Collins, D.C. Dey, I. Drobyshev, C. Farris, M.A. Fenwick, W. Flatley, M.L. Floyd, Z.e. Gedalof, A. Holz, L.F. Howard, D.W. Huffman, J. Iniguez, K.F. Kipfmueller, S.G. Kitchen, K. Lombardo, D. McKenzie, A.G. Merschel, K.L. Metlen, J. Minor, C.D. O'Connor, L. Platt, W.J. Platt, T. Saladyga, A.B. Stan, S. Stephens, C. Sutheimer, R. Touchan, and P.J. Weisberg, 2022: The North American tree-ring fire-scar network. Ecosphere, 13 (7), e4159. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4159
  2. D'Antonio, C.M. and P.M. Vitousek, 1992: Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 23 (1), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.000431
  3. Hagmann, R.K., P.F. Hessburg, S.J. Prichard, N.A. Povak, P.M. Brown, P.Z. Fulé, R.E. Keane, E.E. Knapp, J.M. Lydersen, K.L. Metlen, M.J. Reilly, A.J. Sánchez Meador, S.L. Stephens, J.T. Stevens, A.H. Taylor, L.L. Yocom, M.A. Battaglia, D.J. Churchill, L.D. Daniels, D.A. Falk, P. Henson, J.D. Johnston, M.A. Krawchuk, C.R. Levine, G.W. Meigs, A.G. Merschel, M.P. North, H.D. Safford, T.W. Swetnam, and A.E.M. Waltz, 2021: Evidence for widespread changes in the structure, composition, and fire regimes of western North American forests. Ecological Applications, 31 (8), e02431. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2431
  4. Hessburg, P.F., C.L. Miller, S.A. Parks, N.A. Povak, A.H. Taylor, P.E. Higuera, S.J. Prichard, M.P. North, B.M. Collins, M.D. Hurteau, A.J. Larson, C.D. Allen, S.L. Stephens, H. Rivera-Huerta, C.S. Stevens-Rumann, L.D. Daniels, Z.e. Gedalof, R.W. Gray, V.R. Kane, D.J. Churchill, R.K. Hagmann, T.A. Spies, C.A. Cansler, R.T. Belote, T.T. Veblen, M.A. Battaglia, C. Hoffman, C.N. Skinner, H.D. Safford, and R.B. Salter, 2019: Climate, environment, and disturbance history govern resilience of western North American forests. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 239. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00239
  5. Radeloff, V.C., D.P. Helmers, H.A. Kramer, M.H. Mockrin, P.M. Alexandre, A. Bar-Massada, V. Butsic, T.J. Hawbaker, S. Martinuzzi, A.D. Syphard, and S.I. Stewart, 2018: Rapid growth of the US wildland-urban interface raises wildfire risk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115 (13), 3314–3319. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718850115
  6. Chen, B. and Y. Jin, 2022: Spatial patterns and drivers for wildfire ignitions in California. Environmental Research Letters, 17 (5), 055004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac60da
  7. Keeley, J.E. and A.D. Syphard, 2018: Historical patterns of wildfire ignition sources in California ecosystems. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 27 (12), 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1071/wf18026
  8. UNEP, 2022: Spreading like Wildfire: The Rising Threat of Extraordinary Landscape Fires. A UNEP Rapid Response Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/spreading-wildfire-rising-threat-extraordinary-landscape-fires
  9. Coop, J.D., S.A. Parks, C.S. Stevens-Rumann, S.D. Crausbay, P.E. Higuera, M.D. Hurteau, A. Tepley, E. Whitman, T. Assal, B.M. Collins, K.T. Davis, S. Dobrowski, D.A. Falk, P.J. Fornwalt, P.Z. Fulé, B.J. Harvey, V.R. Kane, C.E. Littlefield, E.Q. Margolis, M. North, M.-A. Parisien, S. Prichard, and K.C. Rodman, 2020: Wildfire-driven forest conversion in western North American landscapes. BioScience, 70 (8), 659–673. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa061
  10. Fettig, C.J., C. Asaro, J.T. Nowak, K.J. Dodds, K.J.K. Gandhi, J.E. Moan, and J. Robert, 2022: Trends in bark beetle impacts in North America during a period (2000–2020) of rapid environmental change. Journal of Forestry, 120 (6), 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvac021
  11. Goulden, M.L. and R.C. Bales, 2019: California forest die-off linked to multi-year deep soil drying in 2012–2015 drought. Nature Geoscience, 12 (8), 632–637. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0388-5
  12. Abatzoglou, J.T. and A.P. Williams, 2016: Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113 (42), 11770–11775. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607171113
  13. Mueller, S.E., A.E. Thode, E.Q. Margolis, L.L. Yocom, J.D. Young, and J.M. Iniguez, 2020: Climate relationships with increasing wildfire in the southwestern US from 1984 to 2015. Forest Ecology and Management, 460, 117861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117861
  14. Parks, S.A. and J.T. Abatzoglou, 2020: Warmer and drier fire seasons contribute to increases in area burned at high severity in western US forests from 1985 to 2017. Geophysical Research Letters, 47 (22), e2020GL089858. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl089858
  15. Stephens, S.L., A.A. Bernal, B.M. Collins, M.A. Finney, C. Lautenberger, and D. Saah, 2022: Mass fire behavior created by extensive tree mortality and high tree density not predicted by operational fire behavior models in the southern Sierra Nevada. Forest Ecology and Management, 518, 120258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120258
  16. Williams, J.N., H.D. Safford, N. Enstice, Z.L. Steel, and A.K. Paulson, 2023: High-severity burned area and proportion exceed historic conditions in Sierra Nevada, California, and adjacent ranges. Ecosphere, 14 (1), e4397. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4397
  17. Abatzoglou, J.T., D.S. Battisti, A.P. Williams, W.D. Hansen, B.J. Harvey, and C.A. Kolden, 2021: Projected increases in western US forest fire despite growing fuel constraints. Communications Earth & Environment, 2 (1), 227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00299-0
  18. Kerns, B.K., C. Tortorelli, M.A. Day, T. Nietupski, A.M.G. Barros, J.B. Kim, and M.A. Krawchuk, 2020: Invasive grasses: A new perfect storm for forested ecosystems? Forest Ecology and Management, 463, 117985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117985
  19. Bradley, B.A., C.A. Curtis, E.J. Fusco, J.T. Abatzoglou, J.K. Balch, S. Dadashi, and M.-N. Tuanmu, 2018: Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) distribution in the intermountain Western United States and its relationship to fire frequency, seasonality, and ignitions. Biological Invasions, 20 (6), 1493–1506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1641-8
  20. Syphard, A.D., J.E. Keeley, M. Gough, M. Lazarz, and J. Rogan, 2022: What makes wildfires destructive in California? Fire, 5 (5). https://doi.org/10.3390/fire5050133
  21. Hayes, K. and B. Buma, 2021: Effects of short-interval disturbances continue to accumulate, overwhelming variability in local resilience. Ecosphere, 12 (3), e03379. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3379
  22. Lydersen, J.M., B.M. Collins, M. Coppoletta, M.R. Jaffe, H. Northrop, and S.L. Stephens, 2019: Fuel dynamics and reburn severity following high-severity fire in a Sierra Nevada, USA, mixed-conifer forest. Fire Ecology, 15 (1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-019-0060-x
  23. Steel, Z.L., D. Foster, M. Coppoletta, J.M. Lydersen, S.L. Stephens, A. Paudel, S.H. Markwith, K. Merriam, and B.M. Collins, 2021: Ecological resilience and vegetation transition in the face of two successive large wildfires. Journal of Ecology, 109 (9), 3340–3355. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13764
  24. Guiterman, C.H., R.M. Gregg, L.A.E. Marshall, J.J. Beckmann, P.J. van Mantgem, D.A. Falk, J.E. Keeley, A.C. Caprio, J.D. Coop, P.J. Fornwalt, C. Haffey, R.K. Hagmann, S.T. Jackson, A.M. Lynch, E.Q. Margolis, C. Marks, M.D. Meyer, H. Safford, A.D. Syphard, A. Taylor, C. Wilcox, D. Carril, C.A.F. Enquist, D. Huffman, J. Iniguez, N.A. Molinari, C. Restaino, and J.T. Stevens, 2022: Vegetation type conversion in the US Southwest: Frontline observations and management responses. Fire Ecology, 18 (1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-022-00131-w
  25. Brooks, M.L., C.M. D'Antonio, D.M. Richardson, J.B. Grace, J.E. Keeley, J.M. DiTomaso, R.J. Hobbs, M. Pellant, and D. Pyke, 2004: Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. BioScience, 54 (7), 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0677:eoiapo]2.0.co;2
  26. Williamson, M.A., E. Fleishman, R.C. Mac Nally, J.C. Chambers, B.A. Bradley, D.S. Dobkin, D.I. Board, F.A. Fogarty, N. Horning, M. Leu, and M. Wohlfeil Zillig, 2020: Fire, livestock grazing, topography, and precipitation affect occurrence and prevalence of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in the Central Great Basin, USA. Biological Invasions, 22 (2), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-019-02120-8
  27. Falk, D.A., P.J. van Mantgem, J.E. Keeley, R.M. Gregg, C.H. Guiterman, A.J. Tepley, D. Jn Young, and L.A. Marshall, 2022: Mechanisms of forest resilience. Forest Ecology and Management, 512, 120129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120129
  28. Stephens, S.L., S. Thompson, G. Boisramé, B.M. Collins, L.C. Ponisio, E. Rakhmatulina, Z.L. Steel, J.T. Stevens, J.W. van Wagtendonk, and K. Wilkin, 2021: Fire, water, and biodiversity in the Sierra Nevada: A possible triple win. Environmental Research Communications, 3 (8), 081004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ac17e2
  29. Kean, J.W., D.M. Staley, J.T. Lancaster, F.K. Rengers, B.J. Swanson, J.A. Coe, J.L. Hernandez, A.J. Sigman, K.E. Allstadt, and D.N. Lindsay, 2019: Inundation, flow dynamics, and damage in the 9 January 2018 Montecito debris-flow event, California, USA: Opportunities and challenges for post-wildfire risk assessment. Geosphere, 15 (4), 1140–1163. https://doi.org/10.1130/ges02048.1
  30. Murphy, B.P., L.L. Yocom, and P. Belmont, 2018: Beyond the 1984 perspective: Narrow focus on modern wildfire trends underestimates future risks to water security. Earth's Future, 6 (11), 1492–1497. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ef001006
  31. Paul, M.J., S.D. LeDuc, M.G. Lassiter, L.C. Moorhead, P.D. Noyes, and S.G. Leibowitz, 2022: Wildfire induces changes in receiving waters: A review with considerations for water quality management. Water Resources Research, 58 (9), e2021WR030699. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021wr030699
  32. Proctor, C.R., J. Lee, D. Yu, A.D. Shah, and A.J. Whelton, 2020: Wildfire caused widespread drinking water distribution network contamination. AWWA Water Science, 2 (4), e1183. https://doi.org/10.1002/aws2.1183
  33. Aubry-Wake, C., A. Bertoncini, and J.W. Pomeroy, 2022: Fire and ice: The impact of wildfire-affected albedo and irradiance on glacier melt. Earth's Future, 10 (4), e2022EF002685. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022ef002685
  34. Skiles, S.M.K., M. Flanner, J.M. Cook, M. Dumont, and T.H. Painter, 2018: Radiative forcing by light-absorbing particles in snow. Nature Climate Change, 8 (11), 964–971. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0296-5
  35. Chase, J. and P. Hansen, 2021: Displacement after the Camp Fire: Where are the most vulnerable? Society & Natural Resources, 34 (12), 1566–1583. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2021.1977879
  36. Muhs, J.W., M. Parvania, and M. Shahidehpour, 2020: Wildfire risk mitigation: A paradigm shift in power systems planning and operation. Journal of Power and Energy, 7, 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1109/oajpe.2020.3030023
  37. Wong-Parodi, G., 2020: When climate change adaptation becomes a “looming threat” to society: Exploring views and responses to California wildfires and public safety power shutoffs. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101757
  38. Cascio, W.E., 2018: Wildland fire smoke and human health. Science of The Total Environment, 624, 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.086
  39. Xu, R., P. Yu, M.J. Abramson, F.H. Johnston, J.M. Samet, M.L. Bell, A. Haines, K.L. Ebi, S. Li, and Y. Guo, 2020: Wildfires, global climate change, and human health. New England Journal of Medicine, 383, 2173–2181. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsr2028985
  40. Peterson, D.L., S.M. McCaffrey, and T. Patel-Weynand, Eds., 2022: Wildland Fire Smoke in the United States: A Scientific Assessment. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 341 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87045-4
  41. Wu, X., R.C. Nethery, M.B. Sabath, D. Braun, and F. Dominici, 2020: Air pollution and COVID-19 mortality in the United States: Strengths and limitations of an ecological regression analysis. Science Advances, 6 (45), 4049. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd4049
  42. Zhou, X., K. Josey, L. Kamareddine, M.C. Caine, T. Liu, L.J. Mickley, M. Cooper, and F. Dominici, 2021: Excess of COVID-19 cases and deaths due to fine particulate matter exposure during the 2020 wildfires in the United States. Science Advances, 7 (33), 8789. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abi8789
  43. Abdo, M., I. Ward, K. O’Dell, B. Ford, J.R. Pierce, E.V. Fischer, and J.L. Crooks, 2019: Impact of wildfire smoke on adverse pregnancy outcomes in Colorado, 2007–2015. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (19), 3720. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193720
  44. Willson, B.E., N.A. Gee, N.H. Willits, L. Li, Q. Zhang, K.E. Pinkerton, and B.L. Lasley, 2021: Effects of the 2018 Camp Fire on birth outcomes in non-human primates: Case-control study. Reproductive Toxicology, 105, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.08.005
  45. Méndez, M., G. Flores-Haro, and L. Zucker, 2020: The (in)visible victims of disaster: Understanding the vulnerability of undocumented Latino/a and Indigenous immigrants. Geoforum, 116, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.07.007
  46. Navarro, K.M., M.T. Kleinman, C.E. Mackay, T.E. Reinhardt, J.R. Balmes, G.A. Broyles, R.D. Ottmar, L.P. Naher, and J.W. Domitrovich, 2019: Wildland firefighter smoke exposure and risk of lung cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality. Environmental Research, 173, 462–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.03.060
  47. Stephens, S.L., J.D. McIver, R.E. Boerner, C.J. Fettig, J.B. Fontaine, B.R. Hartsough, P.L. Kennedy, and D.W. Schwilk, 2012: The effects of forest fuel-reduction treatments in the United States. BioScience, 62 (6), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.6
  48. Arruda, M.R.T., T. Tenreiro, and F. Branco, 2021: Rethinking how to protect dwellings against wildfires. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 35 (6), 06021004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001643
  49. Knapp, E.E., Y.S. Valachovic, S.L. Quarles, and N.G. Johnson, 2021: Housing arrangement and vegetation factors associated with single-family home survival in the 2018 Camp Fire, California. Fire Ecology, 17 (1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-021-00117-0
  50. Hessburg, P.F., S.J. Prichard, R.K. Hagmann, N.A. Povak, and F.K. Lake, 2021: Wildfire and climate change adaptation of western North American forests: A case for intentional management. Ecological Applications, 31 (8), e02432. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2432

Previous Chapter
View All Figures
Next Chapter

Likelihood

Virtually Certain Very Likely Likely As Likely as Not Unlikely Very Unikely Exceptionally Unlikely
99%–100% 90%–100% 66%–100% 33%–66% 0%–33% 0%–10% 0%–1%

Confidence Level

Very High High Medium Low
  • Strong evidence (established theory, multiple sources, well-documented and accepted methods, etc.)
  • High consensus
  • Moderate evidence (several sources, some consistency, methods vary and/or documentation limited, etc.)
  • Medium consensus
  • Suggestive evidence (a few sources, limited consistency, methods emerging, etc.)
  • Competing schools of thought
  • Inconclusive evidence (limited sources, extrapolations, inconsistent findings, poor documentation and/or methods not tested, etc.)
  • Disagreement or lack of opinions among experts

GlobalChange.gov is made possible by our participating agencies

Department of Agriculture Department of Commerce Department of Defense Department of Energy Department of Health and Human Services Department of Homeland Security Department of Interior Department of State Department of Transportation Environmental Protection Agency NASA National Science Foundation Smithsonian Institute Agency for International Development
  • About USGCRP
  • FOIA requests
  • No FEAR Act
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
Looking for U.S. government information and services?
Visit USA.gov